首页> 外文OA文献 >Independent organizations in author-itarian regimes: Contradiction in terms or an effective instrument of developmental states
【2h】

Independent organizations in author-itarian regimes: Contradiction in terms or an effective instrument of developmental states

机译:作者 - 独立制度中的独立组织:发展中国家的矛盾或有效工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This contribution explores the importance of independent organizations in authoritarian regimes. While some authoritarian governments delegate policy tasks to (relatively) autonomous agencies simply in order to improve their domestic or international image as modern political leaders or to build up democratic facades to conceal the actual nature of their regime, other political leaders do so in order to make their genuine commitment to economic growth and development more credible. This relates to the central questions of this paper: Why do political elites in authoritarian regimes craft, or accept the emergence of, (relatively) independent organizations? Which specific forms and functions of these organizations can be identified? The main observation of this paper is that authoritarian governments of so-called developmental states have effectively used (relatively) independent organizations in order to implement market-oriented reforms, to improve private-sector coordination, and to foster economic growth and development in the long run.
机译:这一贡献探讨了独立组织在威权政权中的重要性。虽然一些专制政府将政策任务下放给(相对)自治机构,只是为了提高其作为现代政治领导人的国内或国际形象,或者是为了掩盖其政权的真实本质而建立民主门面,但其他政治领导人却这样做是为了使他们对经济增长和发展的真正承诺更加可信。这涉及到本文的中心问题:威权政体中的政治精英为什么要制造或接受(相对)独立组织的出现?可以确定这些组织的哪些特定形式和职能?本文的主要观察结果是,所谓的发展型国家的专制政府有效地(相对地)使用了独立的组织,以实施以市场为导向的改革,改善私营部门的协调,并长期促进经济增长和发展。跑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号