首页> 外文OA文献 >How Falsifiable is the Collective Model? A New Test with an Application to Monogamous and Bigamous Households in Burkina Faso
【2h】

How Falsifiable is the Collective Model? A New Test with an Application to Monogamous and Bigamous Households in Burkina Faso

机译:集体模式如何可证伪?一项适用于布基纳法索一夫一妻制家庭的新考试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Collective rationality is seldom if ever rejected in the literature, raising doubt about its falsifiability. We show that the standard approach to test the collective model with distribution factors may yield misleading inference. We generalize the model and provide an appropriate test procedure to assess its validity. Our new approach extends to households that include more than two decision-makers (e.g., polygamous households, adult children). We investigate household consumption decision-making within monogamous and bigamous households in Burkina Faso. Using the standard testing approach, collective rationality within monogamous households is not rejected. Using our proposed test procedure, collective rationality is however rejected for monogamous households. Furthermore, our test also rejects collective rationality for bigamous households. We conclude that the household efficiency does yield empirically falsifiable restrictions despite being scarcely rejected in the literature.
机译:集体理性很少在文献中被否决过,从而对其可证伪性产生了怀疑。我们表明,使用分布因子测试集体模型的标准方法可能会产生误导性的推断。我们对该模型进行概括并提供适当的测试程序以评估其有效性。我们的新方法适用于包括两个以上决策者的家庭(例如,一夫多妻制家庭,成年子女)。我们调查布基纳法索一夫一妻制和重婚家庭的家庭消费决策。使用标准测试方法,一夫一妻制家庭中的集体理性不会被拒绝。使用我们建议的测试程序,一夫一妻制家庭会拒绝集体理性。此外,我们的检验还拒绝了重婚家庭的集体理性。我们得出的结论是,尽管文献中很少有人反对,但是家庭效率的确会产生凭经验证明的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号