首页> 外文OA文献 >Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate
【2h】

Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate

机译:预测剖宫产术后成功预期阴道分娩:荷兰全国注册队列中两种预测模型的外部验证,阴道分娩率高

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To externally validate two models from the USA (entry-to-care [ETC] and close-to-delivery [CTD]) that predict successful intended vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) for the Dutch population. DESIGN: A nationwide registration-based cohort study. SETTING: Seventeen hospitals in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Seven hundred and sixty-three pregnant women, each with one previous caesarean section and a viable singleton cephalic pregnancy without a contraindication for an intended VBAC. METHODS: The ETC model comprises the variables maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, previous vaginal delivery, previous VBAC and previous nonprogressive labour. The CTD model replaces prepregnancy BMI with third-trimester BMI and adds estimated gestational age at delivery, hypertensive disease of pregnancy, cervical examination and induction of labour. We included consecutive medical records of eligible women who delivered in 2010. For validation, individual probabilities of women who had an intended VBAC were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discriminative performance was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and predictive performance was assessed with calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistic. RESULTS: Five hundred and fifteen (67%) of the 763 women had an intended VBAC; 72% of these (371) had an actual VBAC. The AUCs of the ETC and CTD models were 68% (95% CI 63-72%) and 72% (95% CI 67-76%), respectively. The H-L statistic showed a P-value of 0.167 for the ETC model and P = 0.356 for the CTD model, indicating no lack of fit. CONCLUSION: External validation of two predictive models developed in the USA revealed an adequate performance within the Dutch population.
机译:目的:从外部验证美国的两种模型(入院治疗[ETC]和接近分娩[CTD]),这些模型可预测荷兰人在剖腹产(VBAC)后成功进行的预期阴道分娩。设计:一项基于全国注册的队列研究。地点:荷兰的17家医院。人口:673名孕妇,每名孕妇均进行过一次剖腹产,并且可行的单例头胎妊娠,且无预期VBAC的禁忌症。方法:ETC模型包括变量,产妇年龄,孕前体重指数(BMI),种族,先前的阴道分娩,先前的VBAC和先前的非进行性劳动。 CTD模型用孕晚期BMI代替了孕前BMI,并增加了分娩时的预计胎龄,妊娠高血压疾病,宫颈检查和引产。我们纳入了2010年分娩的合格女性的连续医疗记录。为进行验证,计算了具有预期VBAC的女性的个体概率。主要观察指标:用接收器工作特性曲线下的面积(AUC)评估判别性能,并使用校准图和Hosmer-Lemeshow(H-L)统计量评估预测性能。结果:763名女性中有515名(67%)有预期的VBAC。其中的72%(371)具有实际的VBAC。 ETC和CTD模型的AUC分别为68%(95%CI 63-72%)和72%(95%CI 67-76%)。 H-L统计数据显示ETC模型的P值为0.167,CTD模型的P值为0.356,表明不存在拟合度。结论:在美国开发的两个预测模型的外部验证显示荷兰人口中有足够的表现。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号