首页> 外文OA文献 >The accuracy of caries risk assessment in children attending South Australian School Dental Service: a longitudinal study
【2h】

The accuracy of caries risk assessment in children attending South Australian School Dental Service: a longitudinal study

机译:参加南澳学校牙科服务的儿童龋病风险评估的准确性:纵向研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: To determine the accuracy of the caries risk assessment system and performance of clinicians in their attempts to predict caries for children during routine practice. Design: Longitudinal study. Setting and participants Data on caries risk assessment conducted by clinicians during routine practice while providing care for children in the South Australian School Dental Service (SA SDS) were collected from electronic patient records. Baseline data on caries experience, clinicians’ ratings of caries risk status and child demographics were obtained for all SA SDS patients aged 5–15 years examined during 2002–2005. Outcome measure: Children’s caries incidence rate, calculated using examination data after a follow-up period of 6–48 months from baseline, was used as the gold standard to compute the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of clinicians’ baseline ratings of caries risk. Multivariate binomial regression models were used to evaluate effects of children's baseline characteristics on Se and Sp. Results: A total of 133 clinicians rated caries risk status of 71 430 children during 2002–2005. The observed Se and Sp were 0.48 and 0.86, respectively (Se+Sp=1.34). Caries experience at baseline was the strongest factor influencing accuracy in multivariable regression model. Among children with no caries experience at baseline, overall accuracy (Se+Sp) was only 1.05, whereas it was 1.28 among children with at least one tooth surfaces with caries experience at baseline. Conclusions: Clinicians’ accuracy in predicting caries risk during routine practice was similar to levels reported in research settings that simulated patient care. Accuracy was acceptable in children who had prior caries experience at the baseline examination, while it was poor among children with no caries experience.
机译:目的:确定龋齿风险评估系统的准确性以及临床医生在常规实践中尝试预测儿童龋齿的表现。设计:纵向研究。背景和参与者从电子病历中收集了在南澳大利亚州学校牙科服务处(SA SDS)为儿童提供照料时,临床医生在常规实践中进行龋齿风险评估的数据。获得了2002-2005年期间检查的所有5-15岁的SA SDS患者的龋齿经验,临床医生的龋齿风险状况等级和儿童人口统计数据。结局指标:儿童龋齿发生率是从基线随访6–48个月后使用检查数据计算得出的,它是金标准,用于计算临床医生对基线的敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)龋齿风险。使用多元二项式回归模型评估儿童基线特征对硒和硒的影响。结果:2002年至2005年期间,共有133名临床医生对71至430名儿童的龋病风险状况进行了评估。观察到的Se和Sp分别为0.48和0.86(Se + Sp = 1.34)。在多变量回归模型中,基线的龋病经验是影响准确性的最强因素。在基线时没有龋齿经验的儿童中,总体准确度(Se + Sp)仅为1.05,而在至少一个有牙齿表面并有龋齿经验的儿童中,总体准确性(Se + Sp)为1.28。结论:临床医生在常规实践中预测龋齿风险的准确性与模拟患者护理的研究环境中报道的水平相似。在基线检查之前有龋病经验的儿童,其准确性是可以接受的,而在没有龋齿经验的儿童中,其准确性较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号