首页> 外文OA文献 >Can we improve children's spelling ability by teaching morphemes through text reading :an intervention study exploring the relationship between morphological awareness and literacy
【2h】

Can we improve children's spelling ability by teaching morphemes through text reading :an intervention study exploring the relationship between morphological awareness and literacy

机译:我们是否可以通过文本阅读教授语素来提高儿童的拼写能力:一项探索形态意识与文化之间关系的干预研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The need to improve children's spelling ability remains audkey government agenda and is an issue encountered frequently byudEducational Psychologists (EPs) in their practice. Recent research hasudsuggested that there is a strong connection between awareness ofudmorphemes and understanding and accurate use of the English spellingudsystem, but relatively little is taught on this subject in school. The aim ofudthe present study was to investigate whether a 5-week intervention canudpromote the development of 6- to 8-year-olds' morphological awarenessudand spelling ability.udMethod: Through the medium of guided group reading, an Interventionudgroup were taught about the morphological rules that govern the spellingudof plural `-s' and past tense `-ecf, whilst a Control group were taught aboutudtwo phonologically-based spelling patterns. The intervention wasudcompatible with current curriculum demands and was delivered to wholeudclasses by their teachers. Pseudoword spelling tasks were administeredudat pre-, immediate post-, and delayed post-intervention points to assessudthe children's learning of the morphological rules in question.udResults: Quantitative analyses suggested that the intervention did notudhave a significant impact on morphological awareness in spelling.udHowever, a third of participating children showed clear gains, and reasonsudfor variation in response to intervention were explored. The overall pictureudindicated that those with better literacy skills have better baselineudmorphological awareness and that they also responded best to theudintervention.udConclusions: The implications of the results are discussed with referenceudto theories of literacy development and individual differences therein; andudin the context of teaching and the profession of Educational Psychology. Itudis hoped that the study will increase the evidence-base of EP work, andudraise awareness that the system of morphemes could be a powerfuludresource for children learning literacy.
机译:背景:提高儿童拼写能力的需求仍然是 udkey政府的议事日程,这是 ududed教育心理学家(EPs)在其实践中经常遇到的问题。最近的研究建议在 udmorphemes的意识和理解和正确使用英语拼写 udsystem之间有很强的联系,但在学校中关于该主题的知识很少。本研究的目的是调查为期5周的干预是否可以促进6至8岁儿童的形态意识,理解和拼写能力的发展。干预 udgroup被教导有关控制拼写 udof复数-s和过去式`-ecf的形态规则,而对照组则被教导关于 udtwo基于语音的拼写模式。干预措施与当前的课程要求不兼容,并由其教师分发给整个班级。伪单词的拼写任务是在干预前,干预后和延迟后进行的,以评估孩子对有关形态规则的学习。结果:定量分析表明,干预对干预没有明显的影响 ud,但是,三分之一的参与测试的儿童表现出明显的进步,并探讨了因干预而变化的原因 ud。总体情况表明,具有较高读写能力的人具有较好的基线形态学意识,并且对 ud干预的反应也最佳。 ud结论:参考 uded发展理论和其中的个体差异讨论了结果的含义;在教学和教育心理学专业的背景下。它希望这个研究会增加EP工作的证据基础,并提高人们对语素系统可能是儿童学习识字能力的强大资源的认识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Colchester Emily J. R.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号