首页> 外文OA文献 >Knowing, doing and the moral mind : development of a non-realist and non-rationalist interpretation of the meaning of moral knowing and its implications for moral education
【2h】

Knowing, doing and the moral mind : development of a non-realist and non-rationalist interpretation of the meaning of moral knowing and its implications for moral education

机译:认识,行动和道德心灵:对道德认知意义的非现实主义和非理性主义解释的发展及其对道德教育的启示

摘要

Modern theories of moral education question the truth of Socrates'sudbelief which involves an idea of positive relationship between 'moraludknowing' and 'doing'. As a result, such theories divide moraludeducation between development of moral judgment and characterudtraining. However, the division of moral education invites a moreudpuzzling philosophical perplexity such as the denial of a relationshipudbetween 'knowing' and 'doing'.udThe study proposes a theory of moral education which dissolvesudthe philosophical perplexity, through a linguistic analysis of the wordsudwhich constitute moral statements and relying on an educationaludexamination of the meaning of 'moral knowing' which is seriouslyuddistorted by Socrates's inadequate definitions of the terms 'virtue' andud`knowledge' in his proposition, 'Virtue is knowledge'.udThe meaning of the word 'X' in the form of moral statement suchudas 'X is good', which is primarily fact-denoting, extends for itsudaccompanying meaning beyond that as delimited by Socrates and theudrealists. Accompanying meanings are moral notions but nondescriptive,udthough they may be in some cases symbolised roughly byudsuch 'notional words' as 'benevolence' and 'justice'. Contrasting withudthe statement such as 'Benevolence is good', which constitutes itselfudwith a notional word, the form of 'X is good' will be meaninglessudunless it is understood with moral notions.ud`Knowing' in moral education is not theoretical, having regard toudthe nature of moral notions. 'Moral notions' embrace both 'knowing'udand 'doing'. Therefore, education for the development of 'moraludmind' must not be confined to clarification of meanings of words andudratiocination of judgments; it should help pupils to perceive moraludqualities in situations where such qualities are deeply embedded and toudimagine the world as it should be from the world as it is.
机译:现代道德教育理论质疑苏格拉底的“信”的真实性,其中涉及“道德”,“知道”与“做”之间的积极关系。结果,这些理论将道德教育划分为道德判断的发展和品格的训练。然而,道德教育的划分引起了更多的令人困惑的哲学困惑,例如否定了“知道”与“做”之间的关系。 ud这项研究提出了一种道德教育理论,该理论通过语言学来解决 ud哲学困惑。对构成道德陈述的单词“ ud”进行分析,并依靠对“道德认识”的含义的教育反驳,这被苏格拉底对命题“美德”和“ udknowledge”的不恰当定义严重扭曲了。 “美德是知识”。 ud以道德陈述形式表示的“ X”一词的含义 udas'X is good'(主要是事实),其 udaccompanying含义的扩展范围超出了由苏格拉底和苏格拉底界定的范围。 超现实主义者。伴随的意义是道德观念,但不是描述性的含义,尽管在某些情况下它们可能被“仁慈”和“正义”等“象征性词语”粗略地象征。与诸如“善是善”之类的陈述本身由一个概念性词语构成的反义词相比,“ X是善”的形式将是毫无意义的除非它被道德观念所理解。 ud`认识'在道德教育中考虑到道德观念的本质,这不是理论上的。 “道德观念”既包含“了解”,“理解”又包含“做”。因此,发展“道德头脑”的教育不应仅限于澄清词语的含义和对判决的解释。它应该帮助学生在这种素质被深深扎根的情况下感知道德/素质,并且应该从现实世界中去想象世界。

著录项

  • 作者

    Joh Moo Nam.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2000
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:03:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号