首页> 外文OA文献 >Sellers Competing for Buyers in Online Markets: Reserve Prices, Shill Bids, and Auction Fees
【2h】

Sellers Competing for Buyers in Online Markets: Reserve Prices, Shill Bids, and Auction Fees

机译:卖家在线市场竞争买家:保留价格,shill Bids和拍卖费用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We consider competition between sellers offering similar items in concurrent online auctions through a mediating auction institution, where each seller must set its individual auction parameters (such as the reserve price) in such a way as to attract buyers. We show that in the case of two sellers with asymmetric production costs, there exists a pure Nash equilibrium in which both sellers set reserve prices above their production costs. In addition, we show that, rather than setting a reserve price, a seller can further improve its utility by shill bidding (i.e., bidding as a buyer in its own auction). This shill bidding is undesirable as it introduces inefficiencies within the market. However, through the use of an evolutionary simulation, we extend the analytical results beyond the two seller case, and we then show that these inefficiencies can be effectively reduced when the mediating auction institution uses auction fees based on the difference between the auction closing and reserve prices.
机译:我们考虑通过中介拍卖机构在同时进行的在线拍卖中提供相似项目的卖方之间的竞争,在这种竞争中,每个卖方必须以吸引买家的方式设置其各自的拍卖参数(例如底价)。我们表明,在两个卖方的生产成本不对称的情况下,存在纯纳什均衡,其中两个卖方将底价设定为高于其生产成本。此外,我们表明,卖方可以通过竞标(即在自己的拍卖中作为买方竞标)来进一步提高其效用,而不必设定底价。这种低价竞标是不受欢迎的,因为它会导致市场效率低下。但是,通过使用进化模拟,我们将分析结果扩展到两个卖方以外的情况,然后表明,当调解性拍卖机构根据拍卖结束和保留之间的差额使用拍卖费时,可以有效地减少这些低效率价格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号