首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring the costs and outcomes of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening interventions targeting men in football club settings: preliminary cost-consequence analysis of the SPORTSMART pilot randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Exploring the costs and outcomes of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening interventions targeting men in football club settings: preliminary cost-consequence analysis of the SPORTSMART pilot randomised controlled trial

机译:探索在足球俱乐部环境中针对男性的性传播感染(sTI)筛查干预措施的成本和结果:spORTsmaRT试点随机对照试验的初步成本 - 后果分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background The objective of this study was to compare the costs and outcomes of two sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening interventions targeted at men in football club settings in England, including screening promoted by team captains. Methods A comparison of costs and outcomes was undertaken alongside a pilot cluster randomised control trial involving three trial arms: (1) captain-led and poster STI screening promotion; (2) sexual health advisor-led and poster STI screening promotion and (3) poster-only STI screening promotion (control/comparator). For all study arms, resource use and cost data were collected prospectively. Results There was considerable variation in uptake rates between clubs, but results were broadly comparable across study arms with 50% of men accepting the screening offer in the captain-led arm, 67% in the sexual health advisor-led arm and 61% in the poster-only control arm. The overall costs associated with the intervention arms were similar. The average cost per player tested was comparable, with the average cost per player tested for the captain-led promotion estimated to be £88.99 compared with £88.33 for the sexual health advisor-led promotion and £81.87 for the poster-only (control) arm. Conclusions Costs and outcomes were similar across intervention arms. The target sample size was not achieved, and we found a greater than anticipated variability between clubs in the acceptability of screening, which limited our ability to estimate acceptability for intervention arms. Further evidence is needed about the public health benefits associated with screening interventions in non-clinical settings so that their cost-effectiveness can be fully evaluated.
机译:背景技术这项研究的目的是比较两种针对英格兰足球俱乐部环境中男性的性传播感染(STI)筛查干预措施的成本和结果,包括由队长进行的筛查。方法与成本和结果进行比较,同时进行一项涉及三个试验部门的试验性集群随机对照试验:(1)由船长领导和海报性传播感染筛查促进; (2)由性健康顾问领导和张贴性传播感染筛查促进活动,以及(3)仅张贴性传播感染性传播感染筛查活动(对照/比较者)。对于所有研究部门,前瞻性地收集了资源使用和成本数据。结果各个俱乐部之间的摄取率差异很大,但各个研究部门的结果大致可比,其中50%的男性接受由队长领导的小组接受筛查,男性接受性健康顾问领导的小组接受67%的筛查,仅海报控制臂。与干预部门相关的总成本是相似的。测试的每个玩家的平均成本是可比的,由队长领导的晋升的每个玩家的平均成本估计为88.99英镑,而由性健康顾问主导的晋升的每个玩家的平均成本为88.33英镑,仅张贴者(对照组)为81.87英镑。臂。结论各干预部门的费用和结果相似。未达到目标样本量,并且我们发现俱乐部之间的筛查可接受性差异大于预期,这限制了我们估计干预组可接受性的能力。还需要进一步的证据证明与非临床环境中的筛查干预措施有关的公共卫生益处,以便可以充分评估其成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号