首页> 外文OA文献 >Sexual health clinic attendance and non-attendance in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3)
【2h】

Sexual health clinic attendance and non-attendance in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3)

机译:英国性健康诊所就诊和不出席:第三次全国性态度和生活方式调查结果(Natsal-3)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives In Britain, sexual health clinics (SHCs) are the most common location for STI diagnosis but many people with STI risk behaviours do not attend. We estimate prevalence of SHC attendance and how this varies by sociodemographic and behavioural factors (including unsafe sex) and describe hypothetical service preferences for those reporting unsafe sex.Methods Complex survey analyses of data from Britain’s third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, a probability survey of 15 162 people aged 16–74 years, undertaken 2010–2012.Results Overall, recent attendance (past year) was highest among those aged 16–24 years (16.6% men, 22.4% women), decreasing with age (1.5% among those 45–74 years). Approximately 15% of sexually-active 16–74 year olds (n=1002 men; n=1253 women) reported ‘unsafe sex’ (condomless first sex with a new partner and/or >=2 partners and no condom use, past year); 75% of these had not attended a SHC (past year). However, of non-attenders aged 16–44 years, 18.7% of men and 39.0% of women reported chlamydia testing (past year) with testing highest in women aged 25 years. Of those aged 16–44 years reporting unsafe sex, the majority who reported previous SHC attendance would seek STI care there, whereas the majority who had not would use general practice.Conclusion While most reporting unsafe sex had not attended a SHC, many, particularly younger women, had tested for chlamydia suggesting engagement with sexual health services more broadly. Effective, diverse service provision is needed to engage those at-risk and ensure that they can attend services appropriate to their needs.
机译:目标在英国,性健康诊所(SHC)是性传播感染诊断的最常见地点,但是许多有性传播感染风险行为的人没有参加。我们估算了SHC出勤率,并根据社会人口统计学和行为因素(包括不安全的性行为)如何变化,并描述了报告不安全性行为者的假设服务偏好。方法英国第三次全国性态度与生活方式调查的复杂调查分析数据,可能性2010-2012年对15162名16-74岁的人群进行了调查。结果总体而言,最近的出勤(过去一年)在16-24岁的人群中最高(男性16.6%,女性22.4%),并且随着年龄的增长而降低(<1.5在45-74岁之间的百分比)。在过去的一年中,约有15%的性活跃的16-74岁年龄段(n = 1002男性; n = 1253女性)报告“不安全的性行为”(与新伴侣和/或> = 2伴侣进行无避孕套的第一次性行为) );其中> 75%的人没有参加SHC(过去一年)。但是,在16-44岁的非犯罪者中,报告有衣原体检测(过去一年)的男性为18.7%,女性为39.0%,其中25岁以下女性的检测最高。在报告过不安全性行为的16-44岁年龄段中,报告过SHC就诊经历的大多数人会在那儿寻求STI的照护,而没有报告过安全性行为的人中的大多数人都将采用常规做法。较年轻的妇女进行了衣原体检测,表明更广泛地参与性健康服务。需要有效,多样化的服务提供来吸引那些处于危险之中的人,并确保他们能够参加适合其需求的服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号