首页> 外文OA文献 >How do scientists define openness? Exploring the relationship between open science policies and research practice
【2h】

How do scientists define openness? Exploring the relationship between open science policies and research practice

机译:科学家如何定义开放性?探索开放科学政策与研究实践之间的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article documents how biomedical researchers in the United Kingdom understand and enact the idea of “openness.” This is of particular interest to researchers and science policy worldwide in view of the recent adoption of pioneering policies on Open Science and Open Access by the U.K. government—policies whose impact on and implications for research practice are in need of urgent evaluation, so as to decide on their eventual implementation elsewhere. This study is based on 22 in-depth interviews with U.K. researchers in systems biology, synthetic biology, and bioinformatics, which were conducted between September 2013 and February 2014. Through an analysis of the interview transcripts, we identify seven core themes that characterize researchers’ understanding of openness in science and nine factors that shape the practice of openness in research. Our findings highlight the implications that Open Science policies can have for research processes and outcomes and provide recommendations for enhancing their content, effectiveness, and implementation.
机译:本文记录了英国的生物医学研究人员如何理解和实施“开放”的思想。鉴于英国政府最近对开放科学和开放获取采取了开创性政策,因此对研究人员和科学政策特别感兴趣,因为这些政策对研究实践的影响和影响都需要紧急评估,以便决定在其他地方最终实施它们。这项研究基于2013年9月至2014年2月之间对英国研究人员进行的22次系统生物学,合成生物学和生物信息学研究人员的深度访谈。通过对访谈笔录的分析,我们确定了代表研究人员特征的七个核心主题对科学开放性的理解以及塑造研究开放性实践的九个因素。我们的发现凸显了开放科学政策可能对研究过程和结果产生的影响,并提出了增强其内容,有效性和实施的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号