首页> 外文OA文献 >Truth, science and chemical weapons: expert advice and the impact of technical change on the Chemical Weapons Convention
【2h】

Truth, science and chemical weapons: expert advice and the impact of technical change on the Chemical Weapons Convention

机译:真相,科学和化学武器:专家建议和技术变革对“化学武器公约”的影响

摘要

Scientific narratives are pervasive in international policy, in part, due to the increasing degree to which technological considerations enter modern thinking. These narratives are particularly visible in the chemical weapon prevention regime, which must accommodate changes in science and technology to ensure that they do not result in the application of new utilities for toxic chemicals as weapons. The dissertation investigates the function of technical experts, and the perceptions of their role, in the procedures of the chemical weapon prevention regime that address technical change. It explores expert involvement in three elements of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC): its negotiation; the Scientific Advisory Board; and in national policy formulation. Ethnography – from an extended placement within the Convention’s monitoring body, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) – as well as interviews and documentary sources provide the methodological basis for the research. The dissertation finds that science is often made political within the international policy setting, and shows how science is employed to support political aims whether it is in accelerating or slowing policy formulation, or in deflecting the policy agenda. It argues that whilst the role of experts and their capacity to influence policy vary with the forums in which they are placed, their effectiveness depends also upon other factors, including institutional support. The dissertation also holds that national approaches to expert advice are reflected in state relationships with experts advising at the international level. The research supports much of the Science and Technology Studies (STS) literature on experts in national settings and has substantial implications for a concept popular in International Relations (IR) literature, namely, ‘epistemic communities’. A case for reframing ‘epistemic communities’ is developed which incorporates notions drawn from STS, such as the important role of ‘boundary organisations’. These are applied to the CWC, and policy recommendations for the OPCW and its member states are presented.
机译:科学叙事在国际政策中无处不在,部分原因是技术因素进入现代思维的程度越来越高。这些叙述在化学武器预防制度中尤为明显,该制度必须适应科学和技术的变化,以确保它们不会导致使用有毒化学物质的新实用工具作为武器。本文研究了技术专家在应对技术变化的化学武器预防制度程序中的作用及其作用的认识。它探讨了专家参与《化学武器公约》(CWC)的三个要素的情况:谈判;科学顾问委员会;并制定国家政策。人种学–从《公约》的监督机构,禁止化学武器组织(OPCW)的广泛位置–以及访谈和文献资料,为研究提供了方法论基础。论文发现,科学经常在国际政策范围内被政治化,并显示了科学是如何被用来支持政治目标的,无论它是在加速或减缓政策制定,还是在歪曲政策议程。它认为,尽管专家的作用及其影响政策的能力随所设论坛的不同而不同,但其有效性还取决于其他因素,包括机构支持。论文还认为,国家与专家咨询的方法反映在国家与国际咨询专家之间的关系中。该研究支持了许多有关国家背景的专家的科学技术研究(STS)文献,并对国际关系(IR)文献中流行的一个概念(即“流行病界”)产生了实质性的影响。开发了一种重新定义“流行病社区”的案例,其中包含了来自STS的概念,例如“边界组织”的重要作用。这些适用于《化学武器公约》,并介绍了禁化武组织及其成员国的政策建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Smallwood Katie;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号