首页> 外文OA文献 >Animal cunning: deceptive nature and truthful science in Charles Kingsley’s natural theology
【2h】

Animal cunning: deceptive nature and truthful science in Charles Kingsley’s natural theology

机译:动物狡诈:查尔斯金斯利自然神学中的欺骗性和真实的科学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Charles Kingsley's natural theology hinged upon his faith in nature's “truthfulness.” He conceptualized nature as a divine text that both exemplified truthfulness and preached it symbolically. However, this view was undermined as modern science increasingly revealed ruthless deception and parasitism throughout the organic world. Faced with such seemingly amoral facts, Kingsley often located divine truthfulness less in nature itself than in the naturalist studying it. Yet moralizing scientific habits in this way would ultimately undermine Kingsley's argument for moral meaning in the natural world. His efforts to conflate moral and factual truth were bound up with his struggle to defend his authority as an interpreter of nature as emerging secular science threatened to both usurp and invalidate this authority.
机译:查尔斯·金斯利的自然神学取决于他对自然“真实性”的信念。他将自然概念化为神圣的文本,既体现了真实性,又象征性地传播了真理。然而,随着现代科学越来越多地揭示了整个有机世界的残酷欺骗和寄生主义,这种观点受到了破坏。面对如此看似不道德的事实,金斯利在自然界中对神的真实性的定位往往不如对自然神论者的定位。然而,以这种方式道德化科学习惯最终将破坏金斯利关于自然世界中道德意义的观点。由于新兴世俗科学威胁要篡改和废除这种权威,他为捍卫道德和事实真相所做的努力与他捍卫自己作为自然的解释者的权威的斗争密不可分。

著录项

  • 作者

    Abberley Will;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号