首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of European systems of direct access to constitutional judges: exploring advantages for the Italian Constitutional Court
【2h】

A comparison of European systems of direct access to constitutional judges: exploring advantages for the Italian Constitutional Court

机译:欧洲直接获得宪法法官制度的比较:探索意大利宪法法院的优势

摘要

As protection of fundamental rights increasingly becomes a defining feature of modern constitutionalism, some countries debate over the opportunity to introduce systems of direct individual access to constitutional judges to increase protection of constitutional rights. Part I of the article provides a comparative overview of the systems of individual constitutional complaint adopted in Europe, focusing on their functioning, structure and admissibility requirements. Part II addresses possible benefits of the introduction of such a system in Italy. After describing the main features of the Italian system of judicial review, the article details proposals that, since 1947, have been presented to introduce a system of direct individual access to the Italian Constitutional Court. Finally, Part III offers reflections on the potential advantages that adoption of such complaint would bring to the Italian legal system, compared to the currently existing avenues of access to the Court.
机译:随着对基本权利的保护日益成为现代宪政的决定性特征,一些国家对引入机会直接引入宪政法官以增加对宪法权利的保护的机会进行了辩论。本文的第一部分对欧洲采用的个人宪法申诉制度进行了比较概述,重点是其功能,结构和可受理性要求。第二部分介绍了在意大利引入这种系统的可能的好处。在描述了意大利司法审查系统的主要特征之后,本文详细介绍了自1947年以来提出的旨在引入直接个人诉诸意大利宪法法院的制度的提议。最后,第三部分反映了与目前现有的诉诸法院途径相比,通过这种申诉将给意大利法律体系带来的潜在优势。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gentili Gianluca;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号