首页> 外文OA文献 >Integration of simulation and DEA to determine the most efficient patient appointment scheduling model for a specific healthcare setting
【2h】

Integration of simulation and DEA to determine the most efficient patient appointment scheduling model for a specific healthcare setting

机译:集成模拟和DEa,以确定针对特定医疗保健环境的最有效的患者预约调度模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: This study is to develop a systematic approach for determining the most efficient patient appointment scheduling (PAS) model for a specific healthcare setting with its multiple appointments requests characteristics in order to increase patients’ accessibility and resource utilization, and reduce operation cost. In this study, three general appointment scheduling models, centralized scheduling model (CSM), decentralized scheduling model (DSM) and hybrid scheduling model (HSM), are considered.\ud\udDesign/methodology/approach: The integration of discrete event simulation and data envelopment analysis (DEA) is applied to determine the most efficient PAS model. Simulation analysis is used to obtain the outputs of different configurations of PAS, and the DEA based on the simulation outputs is applied to select the best configuration in the presence of multiple and contrary performance measures. The best PAS configuration provides an optimal balance between patient satisfaction, schedulers’ utilization and the cost of the scheduling system and schedulers’ training.\ud\udFindings: In the presence of high proportion (more than 70%) of requests for multiple appointments, CSM is the best PAS model. If the proportion of requests for multiple appointments is medium (25%-50%), HSM is the best. Finally, if the proportion of requests for multiple appointments is low (less than 15%), DSM is the best. If the proportion is in the interval from 15% to 25% the selected PAS model could be either DSM or HSM based on expert idea. Similarly, if the proportion is in the interval from 50% to 70% the best PAS model could be either CSM or HSM.\ud\udOriginality/value: This is the first study that determines the best PAS model for a particular healthcare setting. The proposed approach can be used in a variety of the healthcare settings.\ud\udKeywords: data envelopment analysis, discrete event simulation, patient appointment scheduling, multiple appointments, centralized scheduling model, decentralized scheduling model, hybrid scheduling model
机译:目的:本研究旨在开发一种系统的方法,以确定具有多种约会请求特征的特定医疗机构的最有效的患者约会调度(PAS)模型,以增加患者的可及性和资源利用率,并降低运营成本。在这项研究中,考虑了三种通用约会调度模型:集中调度模型(CSM),分散调度模型(DSM)和混合调度模型(HSM)。\ ud \ ud设计/方法/方法:离散事件模拟和数据包络分析(DEA)用于确定最有效的PAS模型。仿真分析用于获得PAS不同配置的输出,并且基于仿真输出的DEA用于在存在多种相反性能指标的情况下选择最佳配置。最佳的PAS配置可在患者满意度,调度员的使用以及调度系统和调度员的培训成本之间实现最佳平衡。\ ud \ ud发现:在存在大量(超过70%)多次约会请求的情况下, CSM是最好的PAS模型。如果多次约会的请求比例中等(25%-50%),则HSM是最好的。最后,如果多次约会的请求比例很小(小于15%),则DSM是最好的。如果比例在15%到25%之间,则根据专家的想法,所选的PAS模型可以是DSM或HSM。同样,如果比例在50%到70%之间,则最佳PAS模型可以是CSM或HSM。\ ud \ ud原始性/值:这是第一项针对特定医疗机构确定最佳PAS模型的研究。所提出的方法可以在各种医疗保健环境中使用。\ ud \ ud关键字:数据包络分析,离散事件模拟,患者约会调度,多次约会,集中调度模型,分散调度模型,混合调度模型

著录项

  • 作者

    Aslani, Nazanin; Zhang, Jun;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号