首页> 外文OA文献 >Electromagnetic wave speed in polar ice: Validation of the CMP technique with high resolution dielectric-profiling and gamma-density measurements
【2h】

Electromagnetic wave speed in polar ice: Validation of the CMP technique with high resolution dielectric-profiling and gamma-density measurements

机译:极地冰中的电磁波速度:使用高分辨率电介质分析和伽马密度测量验证Cmp技术

摘要

The accuracy of the traveltime-velocity and traveltime-depth profile derived from ground-penetrating radar (GPR) common-midpoint (CMP) surveys at different frequencies is investigated for the first time ever by direct comparison with the profile calculated from high resolution dielectric-profiling (DEP) ice core data.In addition, we compare two traveltime profiles calculated from ice core density data by means of different dielectrical mixture models with the DEP based profile.CMP surveys were carried out at frequencies of 25, 50, 100 and 200 MHz near the new European deep drilling site DML05 in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, during the 1998/99 field season.An improved scanning capacitor for high resolution DEP and a Gamma-densiometer for density measurements were used to determine thecomplex dielectric constant and the density at 5 mm increments along the ice core B32, retrieved in 1997/98 at DML05.The comparisons with DEP and density based velocity series show that the CMP velocity series are slightly higher, but asymptotically approach the core based velocities with depth.Root-mean-square differences of the DEP velocity series range between 8% for the 25 MHz CMP and 2% in the case of the 200 MHz survey.Density based velocities differ from the DEP velocities by less than 1%.The traveltime-depth series calculated from the interval velocities show a better agreement between all series than the velocity series.Differences are between 5.7 and 1.4% for the 25 and 200 MHz CMP measurements, and less than 0.6% for the density data.Based on these comparisons we evaluate the accuracy with which the depth of electromagnetic reflectors observed in common-offset profiles can be determined and discuss reasons for the observed differences between CMP- and core based profiles.Moreover, we compare the errors determined from the field measurements with those estimated from GPR system characteristics to provide a measure that can be used to estimate the accuracy of GPR analyses for the planning of GPR campaigns.Our results show that CMP surveys are a useful technique to determine the depth of radar reflectors in combination with common-offset measurements, especially on a region-wide basis.
机译:通过直接与由高分辨率电介质测量得到的剖面进行比较,首次研究了在不同频率下由探地雷达(GPR)共中点(CMP)测量得出的剖面时速和剖面深度的准确性。此外,我们将通过不同介电混合物模型从冰芯密度数据计算得到的两个行进时间曲线与基于DEP的曲线进行了比较.CMP调查以25、50、100和200的频率进行在1998/99野外季节在南极德龙宁莫德(Dronning Maud Land)的欧洲新深钻场DML05附近的MHz处,使用了改进的用于高分辨率DEP的扫描电容器和用于密度测量的伽马密度计来确定复杂的介电常数和密度沿冰芯B32以5 mm的增量递增,于1997/98年在DML05取回。与DEP和基于密度的速度序列的比较表明CMP速度序列的深度略高,但渐近地接近深度的核心速度.25 MHz CMP的DEP速度序列的均方根差介于8%和200 MHz测量的2%之间。与DEP速度的差异小于1%。从间隔速度计算出的行进时间-深度序列显示出所有序列之间的一致性要好于速度序列.25MHz和200MHz CMP测量的差异在5.7%至1.4%之间,并且密度数据小于0.6%。基于这些比较,我们评估了可以确定在公共偏移轮廓中观察到的电磁反射器深度的准确性,并讨论了CMP与基于纤芯的轮廓之间观察到差异的原因。我们将根据现场测量确定的误差与根据GPR系统特性估算的误差进行比较,以提供一种可用于估算GPR分析准确性的方法我们的结果表明,CMP调查是一种有用的技术,可以结合常见的偏移量测量来确定雷达反射器的深度,特别是在整个区域范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号