首页> 外文OA文献 >An Examination of Moral Judgment in College: Integrating Developmental and College Impact Frameworks.
【2h】

An Examination of Moral Judgment in College: Integrating Developmental and College Impact Frameworks.

机译:高校道德判断的考察:发展与大学影响框架的整合。

摘要

Research examining student outcomes in college most often employs either a college impact framework (focusing on the organization and make-up of a college and participation in and experiences with various components of that college) or a developmental framework (focusing on students engagement with cognitive processes that are consistent with theoretically supported mechanisms of development). This study examines the value of integrating these two frameworks in the examination of the developmental of moral judgment during college. Drawing on data from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education, this study examines the development of moral judgment in two samples of students at the end of their first and fourth years of college. Hierarchical linear models were first estimated using the developmental and college impact frameworks individually, and then with a framework that integrates the two. Changes in adjusted pseudo-R2 and coefficient effect sizes were then compared across the models to assess the relative explanatory power of the three frameworks and the threat of omitted variable bias in the restrictive frameworks. Variables consistent with both developmental and college impact frameworks were significant predictors of moral judgment in both samples; this remained true even after the models were integrated. However, few college experiences or institutional conditions were significant predictors of change in moral development. The variables with the largest estimated effects were students’ precollege characteristics (such as academic ability and gender). Additionally, models estimated with an integrated framework provided more explanatory power, both before and after the large effects of precollege variables were taken into account. Integrated models also yielded different effect sizes for most independent variables than the separate frameworks, indicating the presence of omitted variable bias. This study demonstrates that using an integrated framework provides a broader and more detailed picture of the development of moral judgment in college. Researchers and educators alike are encouraged to conceptualize this development using frameworks that do not rely solely on participation in institutional programs or the cognitive demands of those programs, but, rather, to design and implement programs that take both approaches into account.
机译:在大学中研究学生成绩的研究通常采用大学影响框架(侧重于大学的组织和组成,以及对该大学各个组成部分的参与和经验)或发展框架(侧重于学生对认知过程的参与)与理论上支持的发展机制保持一致)。这项研究探讨了在大学时期道德判断能力发展的考试中整合这两个框架的价值。这项研究基于Wabash全国文科教育研究的数据,考察了大学第一年和四年级末两个学生样本中道德判断力的发展。首先使用发展和大学影响力框架分别估计分层线性模型,然后使用将两者结合的框架进行估计。然后,在模型之间比较调整后的伪R2和系数效应大小的变化,以评估三个框架的相对解释能力以及限制性框架中遗漏变量偏差的威胁。在两个样本中,与发展和大学影响框架一致的变量是道德判断的重要预测因子。即使在模型整合之后,情况依然如此。但是,很少有大学经历或机构条件是道德发展变化的重要预测因子。估计影响最大的变量是学生的大学前特征(例如学业能力和性别)。此外,在考虑到大学前变量的巨大影响之前和之后,使用集成框架估算的模型都具有更大的解释能力。对于大多数独立变量,与独立框架相比,集成模型还产生了不同的影响大小,表明存在遗漏的变量偏差。这项研究表明,使用一个集成的框架可以为大学道德判断的发展提供更广泛,更详细的描述。鼓励研究人员和教育工作者使用不仅仅依赖于参与机构计划或这些计划的认知要求的框架来概念化这种发展,而是要设计和实施将两种方法都考虑在内的计划。

著录项

  • 作者

    Holsapple Matthew A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 16:09:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号