首页> 外文OA文献 >Plug-in vs. Wireless Charging: Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis of an Electric Bus System
【2h】

Plug-in vs. Wireless Charging: Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis of an Electric Bus System

机译:插件与无线充电:电动公交系统的生命周期能源和温室气体排放分析

摘要

Vehicle electrification through implementation of electric vehicles (EVs) withrechargeable batteries has the potential to significantly reduce the greenhouse gas emissionscompared to a fleet of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). Wireless charging, asopposed to plug-in charging, is an alternative charging method for electric vehicles (EVs) withrechargeable batteries and can be applicable to EVs with fixed routes, such as transit buses. Thisthesis study adds to the current research of EV wireless charging by utilizing the Life CycleAssessment (LCA) to provide a comprehensive framework for comparing the life cycle energydemand and greenhouse gas emissions associated with a stationary wireless charging all-electricbus system to a plug-in charging all-electric bus system. Life cycle inventory analysis of bothplug-in and wireless charging hardware was conducted, and battery downsizing, vehiclelightweighting and use-phase energy consumption are modeled. A bus system in Ann Arbor andYpsilanti area in Michigan is used as the basis for bus system modeling. Results show that thewirelessly charged battery can be downsized to 27-44% of a plug-in charged battery. Theassociated reduction of 12-16% in bus weight for the wireless buses can induce a reduction of5.4-7.0% in battery-to-wheel energy consumption. In the base case, the wireless charging systemis comparable to the plug-in charging system in terms of life cycle energy consumption andgreenhouse gas emissions. To further improve the energy and environmental performance of awireless charging electric bus system, it is important to focus on key parameters includingcarbon intensity of the electric grid and wireless charging efficiency. If the wireless chargingefficiency is improved to the same level as the assumed plug-in charging efficiency (90%), thewireless charging system would emit 6.3% less greenhouse gases than the plug-in chargingsystem.Keywords: Wireless charging; Plug-in charging; Life cycle assessment; Vehicle
机译:与内燃机车(ICEV)相比,通过实现带可充电电池的电动汽车(EV)进行的汽车电气化具有显着降低温室气体排放的潜力。与插入式充电相反,无线充电是具有可充电电池的电动汽车(EV)的另一种充电方法,并且可应用于固定路线的EV,例如公交车。本论文的研究通过使用生命周期评估(LCA)来为电动汽车无线充电的当前研究提供补充,从而提供了一个综合框架,用于比较与固定无线充电全电客车系统和插入式充电相关的生命周期能量需求和温室气体排放全电动公交系统。对插入式和无线充电硬件的生命周期清单进行了分析,并对电池的小型化,车辆轻量化和使用阶段的能耗进行了建模。密歇根州安阿伯和伊普西兰蒂地区的公交系统被用作公交系统建模的基础。结果表明,无线充电电池的体积可以缩小到插入式充电电池的27-44%。无线总线的总线重量相应减少12-16%,可以使电池到车轮的能耗减少5.4-7.0%。在基本情况下,无线充电系统在生命周期能耗和温室气体排放方面可与插入式充电系统媲美。为了进一步改善无线充电电动公交系统的能源和环境性能,重要的是集中于关键参数,包括电网碳强度和无线充电效率。如果将无线充电效率提高到与假定的插入式充电效率相同的水平(90%),则无线充电系统将比插入式充电系统减少6.3%的温室气体排放。插件充电;生命周期评估;车辆

著录项

  • 作者

    Bi Zicheng (Kevin);

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号