首页> 外文OA文献 >The Ku Klux Klan Act and the Civil Rights Revolution: How Civil Rights Litigation Came to Regulate Police and Correctional Officer Misconduct
【2h】

The Ku Klux Klan Act and the Civil Rights Revolution: How Civil Rights Litigation Came to Regulate Police and Correctional Officer Misconduct

机译:三K党法案和民权革命:民权诉讼如何规范警察和惩教人员的不当行为

摘要

Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code (originally, and more colorfully, known as Section One of the Ku Klux Klan Act, and also known as the Civil Rights Act of 1871) is the workhorse of modem civil rights litigation. Section 1983 provides a remedy to any person whose federally protected rights have been abridged by any other person acting under the color of state law or custom. Thus, the rights protected by this Act change with changing notions of what constitutes a constitutional or federally protected right as well as changing notions of what the appropriate remedy might be. Therefore, the history of this act follows two strains. First, there is the problem of figuring out just what the legislators in 1871 meant to do when they passed Section One of the Ku Klux Klan Act. Second, the rapid expansion of constitutionally protected rights as applied to the states in the twentieth century radically changed section 1983's scope of action. Both strands must be understood to gain an appreciation for how this act works in modem America.
机译:《美国法典》第42编1983年节(最初更为生动,被称为《库克卢克家族法》的第一节,又称1871年的《民权法》)是现代民权诉讼的主力军。 1983年条款为任何受联邦法律保护的权利被其他以州法律或习惯为名义行事的人剥夺了权利的人提供了补救措施。因此,该法保护的权利随着构成宪法或联邦保护的权利的观念的变化以及适当补救措施的观念的变化而变化。因此,该行为的历史遵循两个方面。首先,存在一个问题,就是弄清楚1871年立法者通过《库克克兰家族法案》第一节时的意图。其次,在20世纪,适用于各州的受宪法保护的权利迅速扩大,从根本上改变了1983年的行动范围。必须理解这两个方面,以了解这种行为在现代美国的运作方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alan W. Clarke;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English, en-US
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:02:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号