首页> 外文OA文献 >Drop-in energy performance evaluation of R1234yf and R1234ze(E) in a vapor compression system as R134a replacements
【2h】

Drop-in energy performance evaluation of R1234yf and R1234ze(E) in a vapor compression system as R134a replacements

机译:作为R134a替代品的R1234yf和R1234ze(E)在蒸汽压缩系统中的落入式能量性能评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper presents an energy performance evaluation of two low-GWP refrigerants, R1234yf and R1234ze(E), as drop-in replacements for R134a. Tests are carried out in a monitored vapor compression system combining different values of evaporation and condensation temperature, and without/with the adoption of an internal heat exchanger. The parameters analyzed are volumetric efficiency, cooling capacity and COP and they are presented taking R134a as baseline. Results show that without IHX the average volumetric efficiency for R1234yf and R1234ze is 4% and 5% lower compared with R134a. The cooling capacity obtained with R1234yf and R1234ze is reduced, with an average difference of 9% and 30% without IHX. Also, COP values are about 7% lower for R1234yf and 6% lower for R1234ze than those obtained using R134a. Finally, the use of an internal heat exchanger reduces the COP differences for both replacements.
机译:本文介绍了两种低全球升温潜能值制冷剂R1234yf和R1234ze(E)的能效评估,以作为R134a的直接替代品。测试是在受监控的蒸汽压缩系统中进行的,该系统结合了不同的蒸发和冷凝温度值,并且不使用/不使用内部热交换器。分析的参数是容积效率,冷却能力和COP,它们以R134a为基准给出。结果表明,没有IHX的情况下,R1234yf和R1234ze的平均体积效率比R134a低4%和5%。使用R1234yf和R1234ze获得的冷却能力降低,不使用IHX时的平均差异为9%和30%。同样,与使用R134a获得的COP值相比,R1234yf的COP值降低约7%,R1234ze的COP值降低约6%。最后,内部热交换器的使用减少了两种替代产品的COP差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号