Compounds of natural origin are increasingly used as adjuncts to oral hygiene. We have adopted four distinct approaches to assess the antibacterial activity of dentifrices containing natural active ingredients against oral bacteria in several test systems. Corsodyl Daily (CD), Kingfisher Mint (KM), and Parodontax fluoride (PF) were compared to a dentifrice containing fluoride (Colgate Cavity Protection [CCP]) and one containing triclosan (Colgate Total [CT]). The growth inhibitory and bactericidal potency of the formulations were determined for 10 isolated oral bacteria. Effects of single exposures of simulated supragingival plaques were then determined by epifluorescence and confocal microscopy, while the effects of repeated exposures were quantified by viable counting. Additionally, dense plaques, maintained in continuous culture, were repeatedly dosed, and the outcome was assessed by viable counting and eubacterial DNA profiling. The test dentifrices exhibited variable specificity and potency against oral bacteria in axenic culture. Of the herbal formulations, KM caused the largest viability reductions in simulated supragingival plaques, with CT causing the greatest reductions overall. Following single exposures, CD caused moderate reductions, while PF had no effect. After multiple dosing, all formulations significantly reduced numbers of total, facultative, and Gram-negative anaerobes, but only KM and CT caused greater reductions than the fluoride control. KM also reduced counts of streptococci (rank order of effectiveness: CT > KM > CCP > PF > CD). Marked changes in eubacterial DNA profiles were not detected for any herbal formulation in dense plaques, although KM markedly reduced viable counts of streptococci, in agreement with supragingival data. While both nonherbal comparators displayed antibacterial activity, the triclosan-containing formulation caused greater viability reductions than the herbal and nonherbal formulations.
展开▼
机译:天然来源的化合物越来越多地用作口腔卫生的辅助剂。我们在几种测试系统中采用了四种不同的方法来评估含有天然活性成分的洁齿剂对口腔细菌的抗菌活性。将Corsodyl Daily(CD),Kingfisher薄荷(KM)和Parodontax氟化物(PF)与含有氟化物(Colgate腔体保护[CCP])和含有三氯生的洁牙剂(Colgate Total [CT])进行了比较。对于10种分离的口腔细菌,确定制剂的生长抑制和杀菌力。然后通过落射荧光和共聚焦显微镜确定单次暴露于模拟龈上菌斑的影响,而重复暴露的影响则通过可行的计数进行量化。另外,将连续培养的致密斑块重复给药,并通过可行的计数和真细菌DNA谱图评估结果。在洁齿培养中,测试洁齿剂对口腔细菌表现出可变的特异性和效力。在草药制剂中,KM导致模拟龈上菌斑的生存力下降最大,而CT导致总体下降幅度最大。单次接触后,CD引起中等程度的减少,而PF无作用。多次给药后,所有制剂均显着减少了总厌氧菌,兼性厌氧菌和革兰氏阴性厌氧菌的数量,但只有KM和CT导致的减少量大于氟化物对照。 KM还减少了链球菌的计数(效力等级:CT> KM> CCP> PF> CD)。尽管KM显着降低链球菌的活菌计数,但与龈上的数据相符,尽管在致密菌斑中任何草药制剂都未检测到真细菌DNA谱的显着变化。尽管两个非草药比较剂均显示出抗菌活性,但与草药和非草药配方相比,含三氯生的配方引起的活力降低更大。
展开▼