首页> 外文OA文献 >Principi di una antropologia della persona nell'opera di Ernesto De Martino
【2h】

Principi di una antropologia della persona nell'opera di Ernesto De Martino

机译:Ernesto De martino工作人员的人类学原理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is well known that among cultural anthropologists and philosophers there is always a historical gap and a difference of interests, language and method, which often causes a rivalry between the two disciplines that ends to stiffen anthropology in a collection of descriptions without universal principles and philosophy in a reflection of noble ambitions but unable to consider the individual human cases.udThe main aim of this thesis is to read the complete works of the philosopher and anthropologist Ernesto de Martino (Naples 1908 - Rome 1965) as a point of union, isolated and sui generis, between anthropology and philosophy. The goal is to obtain, from the reading of his works, a true anthropology of the person who somehow bring order to his unsystematic work, searching in it a common thread: the person, based on the overcoming of life in value , synthesis of necessity and freedom, of transcendental truths and cultural variety. Therefore our aim is not to reconstruct philologically the work and the figure of de Martino or investigate from a historical point of view on the originality of the sources present in it. De Martino is not here treated as an end but as an instrument of knowledge of the human person in its essential aspects, moral and ethical. Thus, the aim of this work is theoretical and moral, that is: with the attempt to restore unity to the work of de Martino, we consider the ultimate and overarching meaning of his anthropology, rather than those moments of dialogue between ethnology, politics and philosophy in his work certainly present; then we wonder not so much who was de Martino as a scholar (problem still treated in this work) but what kind of scientific-philosophical proposal is his and if this proposal, given its ethical and epistemological complexity, can become the foundation for an organic human study that so far neither ethnology nor philosophy can, independently of each other, to ensure.
机译:众所周知,文化人类学家和哲学家之间总是存在着历史鸿沟,利益,语言和方法上的差异,这常常导致两门学科之间的竞争,最终导致人类学在没有通用原则和哲学的情况下陷入僵局。本论文的主要目的是阅读哲学家和人类学家埃内斯托·德·马蒂诺的完整著作(那不勒斯,1908年,罗马,1965年),是孤立的结合点。以及人类学和哲学之间的特殊联系目的是通过阅读他的作品来获得一个真正的人类学人类,该人类以某种方式为他的非系统性工作带来秩序,并在其中寻找一个共同的线索:这个人基于克服生命的价值,综合必要性和自由,先验真理和文化多样性。因此,我们的目的不是从语言上重建马蒂诺的作品和形象,也不是从历史的角度对其中的资源的原创性进行研究。在这里,德马蒂诺不被​​视为目的,而是在基本和道德方面作为人类知识的工具。因此,这项工作的目的是理论上和道德上的,也就是说:为了使德马蒂诺的工作恢复统一,我们考虑了他人类学的最终意义和总体意义,而不是人类学,政治学和政治学之间对话的那一刻。他工作中的哲学当然存在;那么我们不知道是谁成为了马蒂诺大学的学者(这个工作仍然要解决这个问题),而是他是什么样的科学哲学建议,并且考虑到它在伦理和认识论上的复杂性,这个建议是否可以成为有机的基础?人类研究表明,迄今为止,民族学和哲学都无法独立地确保这一点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dolce Chiara;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号