首页> 外文OA文献 >Extreme rainfall regime characterization in Sardiniaudusing daily rainfall data
【2h】

Extreme rainfall regime characterization in Sardiniaudusing daily rainfall data

机译:撒丁岛的极端降雨情况特征描述使用每日降雨量数据

摘要

For the design of hydraulic structures for flood conveyance and discharge, orudprotection of territory against flood is fundamental the knowledge of the ``extremeudrainfall regime'' in the area where the hydraulic structures must be set up.udIndeed the design flood is commonly evaluated as output of rainfall-runoff models thatudreceive as input the quantitative description of a rainfall extreme event with a givenudexceedance probability.udThis dissertation assesses the performance of different statistical approaches inudcharacterizing extreme rainfall in the island of Sardinia (Italy).udAfter a detailed review of the theoretical bases of existing methodologies, we compareudthe results obtained from the use of:uda) a Generalized Extreme value (GEV) distribution model, and a Two componentudExtreme Value (TCEV) distribution model, both applied to yearly maxima of dailyudrainfall, and b) a Generalized Pareto (GP) distribution model applied to rainfalludexcesses above a properly specified threshold. For the latter purpose, we use theudMultiple Threshold Method (MTM) developed by Deidda(2010), which demonstrateudgood performance also in the case of quantized records.udIn order to describe the spatial variation of TCEV, GEV and GP model parameters audregional approach based on homogeneous regions, and two versions of Kriging (audcommonly used geostatistical approach) i.e. ordinary Kriging (OK), and Kriging foruduncertain Data (KUD), are compared.udThe obtained results are very promising, pointing towards the use of: a)a GEVuddistribution model for yearly rainfall maxima, and a KUD model to describe the spatialudvariation of model parameters, and b)a GP model for rainfall excesses and either an OKudor a KUD model for the spatial variation of model parameters. The reason why the OKudand KUD approaches lead to the same results in the GP case, is attributed to theudrobustness of the MTM method.
机译:对于设计用于洪水输送和排放的水力结构,或防止洪水泛滥是必不可少的知识,必须在必须设置水力结构的区域内设置``极端/排水状况''。通常被评估为降雨径流模型的输出,而接受作为给定 udexcecence概率的降雨极端事件的定量描述。 ud本文评估了撒丁岛的表征极端降雨的不同统计方法的性能。 (意大利)。 ud在详细审查了现有方法的理论基础之后,我们比较了 ud使用以下方法获得的结果: uda)广义极值(GEV)分布模型和两成分 udExtreme值(TCEV) )分布模型,均适用于每日降雨的年度最大值,并且b)广义Pareto(GP)分布模型适用于高于自然界的降雨赘生物y指定的阈值。为了达到后一个目的,我们使用了Deidda(2010)开发的 udMultiple Threshold Method(MTM),它在量化记录的情况下也表现出了udgood的性能。 ud为了描述TCEV,GEV和GP模型的空间变化比较基于均质区域的参数a udregional方法和两种Kriging(a udome常用的地统计方法),即普通Kriging(OK)和Kriging for un不确定数据(KUD)。 ud获得的结果非常有希望,指向以下用途:a)一个GEV uddistribution模型用于年降雨量最大值,一个KUD模型用于描述模型参数的空间 udvariation,以及b)一个GP模型用于降雨过量,或者一个OK udor一个KUD模型参数的空间变化。 OK udand KUD方法在GP情况下导致相同结果的原因归因于MTM方法的 udrobustness。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hellies Matteo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号