首页> 外文OA文献 >3G Femto or 802.11g WiFi:Which is the Best Indoor Data Solution Today?
【2h】

3G Femto or 802.11g WiFi:Which is the Best Indoor Data Solution Today?

机译:3G Femto或802.11g WiFi:今天最好的室内数据解决方案是什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper HSPA Release 6 femto and IEEE 802.11g WiFi indoor data solutions are investigated from an end user perspective. Femto and WiFi access points are deployed at typical locations in an urban environment and end user performance is measured. Three key performance indicators (KPI) were defined - downlink and uplink user data rates, latency and mobile power consumption. These three KPIs are of high importance when choosing an indoor data solution. Our measurements show that the downlink and uplink data rates of the WiFi solution are significantly higher than femto data rates. Similarly, latency results show that WiFi outperforms the femto solution. Especially, the radio resource control (RRC) connection set-up time increases the latency for the femto. In terms of idle power consumption the best results are obtained when the mobile camps on the femto. Whereas, WiFi performs best in all active mode power consumption measurements. Based on our KPIs, the preferred indoor data solution today is WiFi. The deciding factor is the combined latency and power performance of the WiFi, where WiFi outperforms the femto.
机译:本文从最终用户的角度研究了HSPA Release 6 femto和IEEE 802.11g WiFi室内数据解决方案。毫微微和WiFi接入点部署在城市环境中的典型位置,并衡量最终用户的性能。定义了三个关键性能指标(KPI)-下行链路和上行链路用户数据速率,延迟和移动功耗。在选择室内数据解决方案时,这三个KPI至关重要。我们的测量结果显示,WiFi解决方案的下行链路和上行链路数据速率明显高于毫微微数据速率。同样,延迟结果显示,WiFi的性能优于毫微微解决方案。特别是,无线电资源控制(RRC)连接建立时间会增加毫微微蜂窝的等待时间。就空闲功耗而言,当移动台驻留在毫微微基站上时,可获得最佳结果。而WiFi在所有活动模式功耗测量中表现最佳。根据我们的KPI,当今首选的室内数据解决方案是WiFi。决定因素是WiFi的综合延迟和功率性能,其中WiFi的性能优于毫微微。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号