首页> 外文OA文献 >Environmental and social benefits of the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer: Data from UK TARGIT-A trial centres and two UK NHS hospitals offering TARGIT IORT
【2h】

Environmental and social benefits of the targeted intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer: Data from UK TARGIT-A trial centres and two UK NHS hospitals offering TARGIT IORT

机译:乳腺癌靶向术中放疗的环境和社会效益:来自英国TaRGIT-a试验中心和两家提供TaRGIT IORT的英国NHs医院的数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To quantify the journeys and CO2 emissions if women with breast cancer are treated with risk-adapted single-dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) rather than several weeks’ course of external beam whole breast radiotherapy (EBRT) treatment.Setting: (1) TARGIT-A randomised clinical trial (ISRCTN34086741) which compared TARGIT with traditional EBRT and found similar breast cancer control, particularly when TARGIT was given simultaneously with lumpectomy, (2) 2 additional UK centres offering TARGIT.Participants: 485 UK patients (249 TARGIT, 236 EBRT) in the prepathology stratum of TARGIT-A trial (where randomisation occurred before lumpectomy and TARGIT was delivered simultaneously with lumpectomy) for whom geographical data were available and 22 patients treated with TARGIT after completion of the TARGIT-A trial in 2 additional UK breast centres.Outcome measures: The shortest total journey distance, time and CO2 emissions from home to hospital to receive all the fractions of radiotherapy.Methods: Distances, time and CO2 emissions were calculated using Google Maps and assuming a fuel efficiency of 40 mpg. The groups were compared using the Student t test with unequal variance and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test.Results: TARGIT patients travelled significantly fewer miles: TARGIT 21 681, mean 87.1 (SE 19.1) versus EBRT 92 591, mean 392.3 (SE 30.2); had lower CO2 emissions 24.7 kg (SE 5.4) vs 111 kg (SE 8.6) and spent less time travelling: 3 h (SE 0.53) vs 14 h (SE 0.76), all pu3c0.0001. Patients treated with TARGIT in 2 hospitals in semirural locations were spared much longer journeys (753 miles, 30 h, 215 kg CO2 per patient).Conclusions: The use of TARGIT intraoperative radiotherapy for eligible patients with breast cancer significantly reduces their journeys for treatment and has environmental benefits. If widely available, 5 million miles (8 000 000 km) of travel, 170 000 woman-hours and 1200 tonnes of CO2 (a forest of 100 hectares) will be saved annually in the UK.Trial registration number: ISRCTN34086741; Post results.
机译:目的:量化如果采用风险适应性的单剂量靶向术中放疗(TARGIT)而不是几周的外束全乳放疗(EBRT)治疗的乳腺癌妇女的旅程和CO2排放设置:(1 )TARGIT-一项随机临床试验(ISRCTN34086741),将TARGIT与传统EBRT进行了比较,发现了相似的乳腺癌控制方法,尤其是在同时进行TARGIT联合乳房切除术的情况下,(2)另外2个英国TARGIT中心参加者:485名英国患者(249 TARGIT) ,有236 EBRT)的TARGIT-A试验(在肿块切除术之前进行了随机分组,并且在肿块切除术同时进行TARGIT之前)进行了病理学检查,有地理数据,在完成了TARGIT-A试验之后有22名患者接受了TARGIT治疗,另外2例英国的乳腺中心。结果衡量:从家到医院的最短路程,时间和二氧化碳排放量均能达到最低水平方法:使用Google Maps并假设燃料效率为40 mpg,计算距离,时间和二氧化碳排放量。使用不等方差的Student t检验和非参数Wilcoxon秩和(Mann-Whitney)检验对各组进行了比较。结果:TARGIT患者的行驶里程明显减少:TARGIT 21 681,平均87.1(SE 19.1),而EBRT 92 591,平均392.3(SE 30.2);二氧化碳排放量更低,分别为24.7千克(SE 5.4)和111千克(SE 8.6),旅行时间更少:3小时(SE 0.53)vs 14小时(SE 0.76),所有p u3c0.0001。在半农村地区的两家医院中接受TARGIT治疗的患者可以省去更长的路程(每位患者753英里,30小时,215千克二氧化碳)。具有环境效益。如果能够广泛使用,英国每年将节省500万英里(800万公里)的旅行,17万妇女小时和1200吨二氧化碳(100公顷的森林)。试验注册号:ISRCTN34086741;发布结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号