首页> 外文OA文献 >General Practitioners’ use of and attitudes to acupuncture in relation to the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines—A pilot study
【2h】

General Practitioners’ use of and attitudes to acupuncture in relation to the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines—A pilot study

机译:全科医生对针灸的使用和态度与英国国家健康和护理卓越研究所(NICE)临床指南相关 - 一项试点研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Introduction Until April 2016, acupuncture in the UK was recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) as a potential treatment modality for three conditions, but use of this guidance in primary care is unknown. The aim of this study was to update the mapping of acupuncture on NICE clinical guidelines and to explore general practitioners’ (GPs’) awareness of those guidelines, as well as their views on and referral to acupuncture. It also examined the feasibility of research through electronic questionnaires administered to GPs. Methods Initially, a literature search was conducted of NICE guidelines mentioning acupuncture (up to July 2015). Subsequently, a random sample of 57 GPs in North London was asked to complete an electronic survey. Results Literature search identified one new “do not offer” recommendation (CG171: Urinary Incontinence). Four guidelines discussed acupuncture, concluding evidence was insufficient. The survey yielded 19 responses from 34 potential respondents. Patient demand appeared widespread but small; several GPs received enquiries but provided no access. The most common reason for enquiry was pain management. Importance assigned to guidance and awareness of guidance other than for pain varied significantly: GPs’ decision to offer access did not correlate with guideline awareness. GPs often expected recommendations where there were none. GPs professing least trust in guidance appeared more likely to offer acupuncture access. Conclusion NICE guidelines appeared not to reflect acupuncture provision in primary care. Electronic questionnaires are a feasible research method in primary care, although obtaining up-to-date contact details poses a challenge.
机译:摘要引言直到2016年4月,美国国立卫生与医疗保健研究院(NICE)推荐英国针灸作为三种情况的潜在治疗方式,但在初级保健中使用该指南尚不明确。这项研究的目的是更新NICE临床指南上的针灸图谱,并探索全科医生(GPs)对这些指南的认识,以及他们对针灸的看法和转介。它还通过向全科医生发放电子问卷调查了研究的可行性。方法最初,对提及针灸的NICE指南进行文献检索(截至2015年7月)。随后,随机抽取了北伦敦的57名GP样本进行电子调查。结果文献检索确定了一项新的“不提供”建议(CG171:尿失禁)。有四项准则讨论了针灸,结论证据不足。该调查从34位潜在的受访者中获得19条回复。患者需求似乎普遍但很小。几个GP收到了查询,但没有提供访问权限。询问的最常见原因是疼痛管理。分配给指导的重要性和除疼痛之外的其他指导意识有很大不同:全科医生提供治疗的决定与指导意识无关。全科医生通常期望在没有建议的情况下提出建议。对指导的信任度最低的全科医生似乎更有可能提供针灸途径。结论NICE指南似乎并未反映针灸在初级保健中的提供。电子问卷是在基层医疗中可行的研究方法,尽管获取最新的联系方式构成了挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号