首页> 外文OA文献 >De-institutionalization of highbrow culture? Curricula in secondary education in Flanders, 1930-2000
【2h】

De-institutionalization of highbrow culture? Curricula in secondary education in Flanders, 1930-2000

机译:高雅文化的非制度化? 1930年至2000年佛兰德斯中学教育课程

摘要

It is claimed that from the sixties onwards the educational system has contributed to the erosion of the institutionalized character of fine arts. In line with a worldwide trend towards more student-centred curricula—some authors argue that the exclusive focus on high culture in school curricula has dwindled. However, empirical research to substantiate these claims is scarce. We focus on secondary education in Flanders to study the centrality of high culture in the educational system: can we discover trends in what forms of culture are represented at school, and do these trends differ between tracks? Our analyses indicate that—in the period 1930-2000—both high and low culture is increasingly being represented in the school context. However, we find that the increment in high culture is especially situated in the academic track—the most prestigious track, which prepares for higher education. These results suggest a persisting institutional embeddedness of high culture in the educational system, and especially in its dominant track.
机译:据称,从六十年代开始,教育制度就导致美术制度化特征的侵蚀。与世界范围内越来越倾向于以学生为中心的课程发展趋势相一致,一些作者认为,学校课程中对高文化的排他性逐渐减少。但是,缺乏实证研究来证实这些说法。我们专注于法兰德斯的中学教育,以研究高文化在教育系统中的中心地位:我们能否发现学校代表哪种文化形式的趋势,并且这些趋势在不同轨道之间是否有所不同?我们的分析表明,在1930-2000年期间,高中文化和低文化都越来越多地出现在学校环境中。但是,我们发现,高级文化的增长尤其位于学术领域-最负盛名的领域,这为高等教育做准备。这些结果表明,高等文化在教育体系中,特别是在其主导地位,在制度上具有持续的嵌入性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Daenekindt Stijn; Roose Henk;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号