首页> 外文OA文献 >The construct validity of the Dutch personality inventory for DSM-5 personality disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample
【2h】

The construct validity of the Dutch personality inventory for DSM-5 personality disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample

机译:临床样本中Dsm-5人格障碍(pID-5)荷兰人格清单的构造效度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The factor structure and the convergent validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), a self-report questionnaire designed to measure personality pathology as advocated in the fifth edition, Section III of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), are already demonstrated in general population samples, but need replication in clinical samples. In 240 Flemish inpatients, we examined the factor structure of the PID-5 by means of exploratory structural equation modeling. Additionally, we investigated differences in PID-5 higher order domain scores according to gender, age and educational level, and explored convergent and discriminant validity by relating the PID-5 with the Dimensional Assessment of Personality PathologyBasic Questionnaire and by comparing PID-5 scores of inpatients with and without a DSM-IV categorical personality disorder diagnosis. Our results confirmed the original five-factor structure of the PID-5. The reliability and the convergent and discriminant validity of the PID-5 proved to be adequate. Implications for future research are discussed.
机译:《 DSM-5人格量表》(PID-5)的因子结构和收敛效度,这是一种自我报告调查表,旨在测量人格病理,这是第五版所提倡的《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》(DSM)第三节-5)已在一般人群样本中得到证实,但需要在临床样本中复制。在240名佛兰德住院患者中,我们通过探索性结构方程模型研究了PID-5的因子结构。此外,我们根据性别,年龄和受教育程度调查了PID-5高阶域得分的差异,并通过将PID-5与人格病理学基本问卷进行了评估,并比较了PID-5的PID-5得分,探讨了聚合效度和判别效度。有和没有DSM-IV类别人格障碍诊断的住院患者。我们的结果证实了PID-5的原始五因子结构。 PID-5的可靠性以及收敛性和判别有效性被证明是足够的。讨论了对未来研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号