首页> 外文OA文献 >Models of social behaviour based on game theory
【2h】

Models of social behaviour based on game theory

机译:基于博弈论的社会行为模型

摘要

The emergence of cooperation created a puzzle for generations of scientists across several disciplines (Pennisi 2009). Why an individual would sacrifice herself for another when natural selection favors the survival of the fittest? Charles Darwin himself remarked the paradox of a worker bee that labors for the good of the colony, although its efforts do not lead to its own reproduction. He proposed that selection might favor families whose members were cooperative, and it is accepted today that kinship helps explain cooperation. But defectors, those who benefit without making a sacrifice, are likely to evolve because they will have an advantage over individuals who spend energy on helping others, therefore jeopardizing the stability of any cooperative effort. Yet cooperation and apparently even altruism have evolved and remained, on any level of biological organization. Without cooperation, genomes, cells or multicellular organims would have never been formed (Maynard Smith and Szathmary 1995). There are numerous examples of cooperation in both animal and human kingdoms and to this date there is no widely acceptable explanation why. The suitable theoretical framework to address this issue is evolutionary game theory (Axelrod and Hamilton 1981; Axelrod 1984), which has been intensively used for this research during recent years. Its main virtue consists in that it allows to pose the dilemmas involved in cooperation, and the mechanisms proposed to explain it, in a simple and rigorous manner. In what follows, we will introduce the basic concepts from game theory and then we will discuss some possible mechanisms which lead to the promotion of cooperation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
机译:合作的出现为跨学科的几代科学家困惑(Pennisi 2009)。当自然选择有利于优胜劣汰时,为什么一个人会牺牲自己呢?查尔斯·达尔文(Charles Darwin)本人也指出了工蜂的悖论,即为殖民地的利益而努力,尽管其努力并未导致其自身繁殖。他提出选择可能会有利于成员之间有合作关系的家庭,亲戚关系有助于解释合作关系,这一点今天已被接受。但是叛逃者,那些不付出牺牲就受益的叛逃者,可能会进化,因为他们将比那些花精力在帮助​​他人上的个人具有优势,从而危及任何合作努力的稳定性。然而,在任何水平的生物组织上,合作,甚至显然是利他主义都已经发展并存在。没有合作,就不会形成基因组,细胞或多细胞器官(Maynard Smith和Szathmary 1995)。在动物界和人类界都有许多合作的例子,迄今为止,尚无广泛接受的解释。解决这一问题的合适理论框架是进化博弈论(Axelrod and Hamilton 1981; Axelrod 1984),近年来已被广泛用于这项研究。它的主要优点在于,它允许以简单而严格的方式提出合作中的困境,并提出了解释这种困境的机制。接下来,我们将介绍博弈论中的基本概念,然后讨论导致合作促进的一些可能机制。 -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------

著录项

  • 作者

    Grujić Jelena;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号