首页> 外文OA文献 >Public participation best practices in environmental decision-making in Newfoundland and Labrador - analyzing the forestry management planning process
【2h】

Public participation best practices in environmental decision-making in Newfoundland and Labrador - analyzing the forestry management planning process

机译:纽芬兰和拉布拉多环境决策的公众参与最佳实践 - 分析林业管理规划过程

摘要

Public participation may improve the quality of environmental management decisions, however, the quality of such decisions depend on the quality of the participatory process. This research examines elements seen as essential for successful public participation in Newfoundland and Labrador. It also seeks to determine whether the 2014-2024 Provincial Sustainable Forest Management Strategy (PSFMS) consultation process met the best practices criteria emerging from the literature. The research used an exploratory case study strategy to consider the specified process, with data collection methods including formal semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The findings of this research revealed that although not all of the eight best practices outlined by Reed were present in the case analyzed, they are applicable guidelines for future forest management participation processes in Newfoundland and Labrador. Two additional best practices were also identified as important for successful public engagement in the province.
机译:公众参与可以提高环境管理决策的质量,但是,此类决策的质量取决于参与过程的质量。这项研究调查了对纽芬兰和拉布拉多成功公众参与至关重要的要素。它还试图确定2014-2024年省级可持续森林管理战略(PSFMS)咨询过程是否符合文献中提出的最佳实践标准。该研究使用探索性案例研究策略来考虑指定的过程,并采用包括正式的半结构化访谈和文档分析在内的数据收集方法。这项研究的结果表明,尽管在分析的案例中并非所有Reed概述的八个最佳实践都存在,但它们是纽芬兰和拉布拉多地区未来森林管理参与过程的适用准则。还确定了另外两个最佳实践,对成功地在该省开展公众参与很重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Whyte-Jones Kimberley;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号