首页> 外文OA文献 >Response to Corner Brook Pulp Paper Tire Derived Fuel (TDF) Co-Firing Trial Project Proponent: Corner Brook Pulp Paper Ltd. (Reg. 1539)
【2h】

Response to Corner Brook Pulp Paper Tire Derived Fuel (TDF) Co-Firing Trial Project Proponent: Corner Brook Pulp Paper Ltd. (Reg. 1539)

机译:对Corner Brook pulp&paper轮胎衍生燃料(TDF)共同射击试验项目的回应支持者:Corner Brook pulp&paper Ltd.(Reg.1539)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While acknowledging potential economic benefits for Corner Brook Pulp and Paper (CBPP) in using tire-derived fuel (TDF), we remain unconvinced of the net public and environmental health benefits of its use and are concerned with the methodology of the proposed test. We hope that this overview of our concerns can help the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) make an informed decision regarding the testing of TDF at CBPP. Guiding our submission is the precautionary principle, which has been adopted by all relevant parties, including the Government of Canada, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador and CBPP. As such and in light of the issues below, it is our position that additional research is required before moving to a test trial. This can be achieved either by conducting a full Environmental Impact Statement, including component studies and additional public hearings, or by rejecting the undertaking outright.
机译:在承认Corner Brook制浆造纸公司(CBPP)在使用轮胎衍生燃料(TDF)方面的潜在经济利益的同时,我们仍然不相信使用该轮胎产生的公共和环境健康净收益,并关注拟议测试的方法。我们希望我们对这些关注的概述能够帮助环境与保护部(DEC)就CBPP的TDF测试做出明智的决定。指导我们的意见的是预防原则,包括加拿大政府,纽芬兰和拉布拉多政府以及加拿大生物多样性公约等所有有关方面都采用了预防原则。因此,鉴于以下问题,我们的立场是,在进行测试之前,需要进行其他研究。这可以通过进行完整的《环境影响声明》(包括组成部分研究和其他公开听证会)或完全拒绝进行来实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号