首页> 外文OA文献 >The Work of Art and Truth of Being as u22Historicalu22: Reading Being and Time, u22The Origin of the Work of Art,u22 and the u22Turnu22 (Kehre) in Heidegger’s Philosophy of the 1930s
【2h】

The Work of Art and Truth of Being as u22Historicalu22: Reading Being and Time, u22The Origin of the Work of Art,u22 and the u22Turnu22 (Kehre) in Heidegger’s Philosophy of the 1930s

机译:艺术作品和存在的真理作为 u22历史 u22:阅读存在与时间, u22艺术作品的起源,以及20世纪30年代海德格尔哲学中的 u22转变(Kehre)

摘要

Reading Heidegger’s Being and Time, “The Origin of the Work of Art,” and the 1934-35 lecture courses Hölderlin’s Hymns“Germania” and “The Rhine,” the aim of this essay is twofold. First, the essay attempts to elucidate the manner in which the work of art functions as a superlative event of “truth-happening” (aletheia), which facilitates the movement of Dasein into the truth of Being as a legitimate member of a community, serving as, “the origin of a people’s authentic historical existence.”1 Second, it explains why this notion of art as the historical manifestation of Being is crucial to understanding the shift, or “turn,” (Kehre) in Heidegger’s philosophy of the 1930s and 1940s, i.e., it examines the philosophical problems Heidegger rectified when moving from Being and Time, and the conceptual-linguistic constraints of metaphysics and the subject-centered model of Dasein, to the later works on art and poetry.
机译:读海德格尔的《存在与时间》,“艺术作品的起源”和1934-35年霍德林的赞美诗“德国”和“莱茵河”课程,这是双重目的。首先,本文试图阐明艺术作品作为“真相”(无神论)的最高级事件起作用的方式,这促进了该在运动成为存在作为社区合法成员的事实。 1,其次,它解释了为什么这种艺术概念作为“存在”的历史表现形式,对于理解海德格尔1930年代哲学的转变或“转折”(Kehre)至关重要。 1940年代,它考察了海德格尔从“存在与时间”,形而上学的概念语言学约束和以实为中心的模型转向后来的艺术和诗歌作品时纠正的哲学问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Magrini James;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:00:52

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号