首页> 外文OA文献 >Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study.
【2h】

Efficacy of morning-only compared with split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for afternoon colonoscopy: a randomized controlled single-blind study.

机译:仅用于早晨的疗效与用于下午结肠镜检查的分剂量聚乙二醇电解质溶液相比:随机对照单盲研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Administering a purgative close to the time of colonoscopy is optimal for cleansing. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of morning-only (AM-only) polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) to split-dose (PM/AM) PEG-ELS for afternoon colonoscopy.METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, non-inferiority study comparing AM-only to PM/AM PEG-ELS for afternoon outpatient colonoscopy. The primary end point was whole colon prep adequacy. Tolerance and polyp detection were secondary outcomes.RESULTS: Overall, 125 patients were randomized and 9 withdrew without taking any prep. Of 116 analyzed, 62 received AM-only prep and 54 received PM/AM prep. The whole colon prep was adequate in 92% in the AM-only group vs. 94% in the PM/AM group (95% lower confidence limit, LCL, for the difference=-11.3%, non-inferiority P=0.013), whereas the right colon prep was adequate in 93 and 92%, respectively (95% LCL=-7.8%, non-inferiority P=0.003). Polyp detection was greater, and not inferior, in the AM-only group (mean=1.57 vs. 0.94 polyps/patient, non-inferiority P=0.007). The overall incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.273), but the AM-only group had lower incidence of abdominal pain (P=0.024). The AM-only group also had better sleep quality (P=0.007) and less interference with the previous workday (P=0.019).CONCLUSIONS: AM-only and PM/AM PEG-ELS are clinically equivalent with respect to cleansing efficacy and polyp detection. AM-only prep was associated with a lower incidence of abdominal pain, superior sleep quality, and less interference with workday before colonoscopy.
机译:目的:在结肠镜检查时间附近服用泻药是清洁的最佳选择。这项研究的目的是比较下午结肠镜检查中仅早晨(仅AM)的聚乙二醇电解质溶液(PEG-ELS)与分剂量(PM / AM)PEG-ELS的功效和耐受性。一项单中心,前瞻性,随机,研究者盲目的非劣效性研究,比较了仅AM与PM / AM PEG-ELS用于下午门诊结肠镜检查。主要终点是整个结肠准备是否充分。结果:耐受性和息肉检测为次要结果。结果:总体上,随机抽取125例患者,其中9例未经任何准备就退出。在分析的116个中,有62个接受了仅AM的准备,而54个接受了PM / AM的准备。仅AM组的全结肠准备水平为92%,而PM / AM组为94%(置信度下限95%,LCL,差异= -11.3%,非劣效性P = 0.013),正确的结肠准备率分别为93%和92%(95%LCL = -7.8%,非劣效性P = 0.003)。仅AM组的息肉检出率更高,但并不逊色(平均息肉= 1.57 vs. 0.94息肉/患者,非劣势P = 0.007)。两组的不良事件总发生率无显着差异(P = 0.273),但仅AM组腹痛发生率较低(P = 0.024)。仅AM组还具有更好的睡眠质量(P = 0.007)和对前一个工作日的干扰较少(P = 0.019)。结论:AM-only和PM / AM PEG-ELS在清洁功效和息肉方面在临床上是等效的检测。仅AM的准备与较低的腹痛发生率,较高的睡眠质量以及对结肠镜检查前工作日的干扰较小有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号