首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison studies of resolution and noise properties between drum type and laser type film digitization systemsud
【2h】

Comparison studies of resolution and noise properties between drum type and laser type film digitization systemsud

机译:鼓型和激光型胶片数字化系统的分辨率和噪声特性的比较研究 ud

摘要

Developments of computer technology and image processing have shifted conventional industrial radiography application to industrial digital radiography (IDR) system. In this study, two types of IDR modules for non destructive testing (NDT), namely drum- and laser- type film digitizer with 50 ?m pixel pitch have been evaluated for NDT applications. The modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS) measurement were adapted to evaluate the image quality of IDR images. Results shown the averaged MTF for drum- and laser- type film digitizer at 20% modulation were 6.15 cycles/mm and 6.55 cycles/mm respectively. For NPS measurement and calculation, the result obtained shows that drum type film digitizer produced higher noise then laser type film digitizer. The study shows that the laser type film digitizer is the best system to be used for film digitization purposes because the MTF result shows that it modulates better than drum type and has the lowest and stable NPS
机译:计算机技术和图像处理的发展已将传统的工业射线照相应用转移到工业数字射线照相(IDR)系统。在这项研究中,针对NDT应用评估了两种类型的IDR无损检测(NDT)模块,即具有50 µm像素间距的鼓型和激光型胶片数字化仪。调制传递函数(MTF)和噪声功率谱(NPS)测量适用于评估IDR图像的图像质量。结果显示,鼓型和激光型胶片数字化仪在20%调制时的平均MTF分别为6.15个循环/毫米和6.55个循环/毫米。对于NPS的测量和计算,所得结果表明,鼓型胶片数字化仪比激光型胶片数字化仪产生更高的噪声。研究表明,激光型胶片数字化仪是用于胶片数字化目的的最佳系统,因为MTF结果表明它的调制性能优于鼓型,并且NPS最低且稳定

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号