首页> 外文OA文献 >Development of software for rigid pavement thickness design
【2h】

Development of software for rigid pavement thickness design

机译:刚性路面厚度设计软件的开发

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rigid pavement is frequently misunderstood form of construction. Many people assume that rigid pavement is costly and not effective. However, it has been proven that it is good in term of the strength and durability to cater high traffic load compare to flexible pavement. However, in order to have good rigid pavement, the design procedures of the pavement should be properly applied. The vital issue in pavement design is thickness. There are two main approaches of design the rigid pavement thickness which are Portland Cement Association (PCA) method and American Association of States Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) method. However, both methods are difficult to conduct manually and may produce inaccurate result. The difficulties can be expressed in term of time consuming and tedious calculation. Hence, it is very important to computerize the methods in order to make it more accurate and quicker. Although there are available software in the market but the software may not be user-friendly enough. It also does not allow the user to compare between methods. Generally, both methods have their own concept but there are still several same parameters considered. Therefore, the significance comparison between both methods can be done to select most economical pavement thickness design. Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 was the tools used to develop the new software. Software named as AnP Pave was successfully developed. Moreover, based on the verification result there are only small difference between the software and manual calculation. However, an improvement needs to be applied to make the software capable to design pavement reinforcement and produce printable design report.
机译:刚性路面经常被误解为建筑形式。许多人认为刚性路面成本高昂且效率低下。但是,已经证明,与柔性路面相比,在强度和耐用性方面能够满足高交通负荷是很好的。但是,为了具有良好的刚性路面,应正确应用路面的设计程序。路面设计的关键问题是厚度。设计刚性路面厚度的主要方法有两种:波特兰水泥协会(PCA)方法和美国州公路和运输官员协会(AASHTO)方法。但是,这两种方法都难以手动执行,并且可能会产生不准确的结果。困难可以用费时和繁琐的计算来表达。因此,使这些方法计算机化以使其更准确和更快是非常重要的。尽管市场上有可用的软件,但是该软件可能不够友好。它还不允许用户在方法之间进行比较。通常,这两种方法都有其自己的概念,但仍要考虑几个相同的参数。因此,可以在两种方法之间进行显着性比较,以选择最经济的路面厚度设计。 Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0是用于开发新软件的工具。成功开发了名为AnP Pave的软件。此外,基于验证结果,软件和手动计算之间只有很小的差异。但是,需要进行改进以使该软件能够设计路面加固并生成可打印的设计报告。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号