首页> 外文OA文献 >Conflict Perspectives in Analyzing and Understanding Organizational Behavior
【2h】

Conflict Perspectives in Analyzing and Understanding Organizational Behavior

机译:分析和理解组织行为中的冲突观点

摘要

Complex organizations and highly structured organizational networks are part of the obvious features of contemporary life. Organizations, being universal and worldwide phenomenon are becoming increasingly crucial to our life; they often serve as a means for our social, economic and political development. In our contemporary life, organization have developed to be very complex and diverse entities, formed with very high structure of networks. As a result of these developments, theories have been developed in an attempt to have a better understanding of organizations and thus creating a more effective and efficient organizations. The rational model has been projected as a gigantic and fabulous instrument and way of thinking towards the contemporary organizations, whereby an organization is perceived and believed to be a stable entity, always integrated, consensus, ordering and well coordinated, only if the rules of the scientific management and bureaucratic model are being fully adopted. Nevertheless, in early 1970s, Western cultures have reached a discontinuity. The decade opened opportunities and led to a societal confusion that we now recognize as signaling the end of an era, the end of a millennia, the ends of the cold war and sovereign states. The changes were massive, they affected the meaning of power. They affected our values. As a 'result, theories were developed to explain the changes that happened in the recent decades or predict the events of coming decades. However, rationality models were increasingly recognized to be devoid of empirical content. Whilst, order and progress in organization had not happened all the time, cooperation was too fragile and fleeting, purposiveness was too elusive, conflict and coercion were too frequent, disintegration, differences, antagonism and divided loyalties were valid representations of contemporary organizational reality, which was demonstrated by a huge number of institutions in contemporary Western civilization. Thus, this article is an attempt to analyze conflict as a significant intellectual paradigm and approach in understanding organizational behavior.
机译:复杂的组织和高度结构化的组织网络是当代生活的明显特征的一部分。组织的普遍性和全球性现象对我们的生活变得越来越重要。它们通常是我们社会,经济和政治发展的一种手段。在我们的当代生活中,组织已经发展成为非常复杂和多样的实体,形成了非常高的网络结构。这些发展的结果是,已经发展了一些理论,以期更好地了解组织,从而创建出更加有效和高效的组织。理性模型已被投影为对当代组织的巨大和神话般的工具和思维方式,据此,一个组织被认为并被认为是一个稳定的实体,只有在遵循规则的前提下,它才会始终保持整合,共识,有序和协调良好。科学管理和官僚主义模式正在被全面采用。然而,在1970年代初,西方文化已经不连续了。十年打开了机会,并导致了社会混乱,我们现在认识到这标志着时代的结束,一千年的结束,冷战和主权国家的结束。变化是巨大的,它们影响了权力的含义。他们影响了我们的价值观。作为结果,发展了理论来解释近几十年来发生的变化或预测未来几十年的事件。但是,人们越来越认识到理性模型缺乏经验内容。虽然组织的秩序和进步一直没有发生,但合作过于脆弱和短暂,目的性太难以捉摸,冲突和胁迫过于频繁,瓦解,分歧,对抗和忠诚的分裂是当代组织现实的有效代表,在当代西方文明中有大量的机构证明了这一点。因此,本文试图将冲突分析作为理解组织行为的重要智力范式和方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mohd Nain Ahmad Shukry;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号