首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography
【2h】

A comparison between linear backprojection (transpose) and layergram backprojection methods for image reconstruciton in charged- couple device (CCD) based optical tomography

机译:基于电荷耦合器件(CCD)的光学X线断层摄影术中用于图像重建的线性反投影(transpose)和法线反投影方法之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The image reconstruction process for CCD–based optical tomography with four projections is discussed in this paper. The CCD linear image sensor used in the study is a Sony ILX551A which has 2048 pixels with a pixel size of 14-microns. The pixel arrangement used in the system is a combination of octagonal and square pixels to ensure that light passes through the same number of pixel rows on all four projections. Two image reconstruction methods are discussed and compared in the paper – the transpose method and the layergram method. The transpose method involves the multiplication and inversion of matrices while the layergram method is simply the addition of the values of attenuation coefficients. The layergram method was found to produce better images than the transpose method, qualitatively and quantitatively (values of a). However, the transpose method requires a shorter processing time than the layergram method.
机译:本文讨论了具有四个投影的基于CCD的光学层析成像的图像重建过程。研究中使用的CCD线性图像传感器是Sony ILX551A,它具有2048个像素,像素大小为14微米。系统中使用的像素排列是八边形像素和正方形像素的组合,以确保光通过所有四个投影上相同数量的像素行。本文讨论并比较了两种图像重建方法-转置方法和layergram方法。转置方法涉及矩阵的乘法和求逆,而分层图方法只是将衰减系数的值相加。发现图层图方法在质量和数量上(a的值)比转置方法产生的图像更好。但是,转置方法比分层图方法需要更短的处理时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号