首页> 外文OA文献 >False data detection in mobile ad-hoc network based on digital signature
【2h】

False data detection in mobile ad-hoc network based on digital signature

机译:基于数字签名的移动自组织网络中的虚假数据检测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Routing misbehavior and false communication on wireless sensor network are so significant. An attacker can devour the sensor resources. No central monitoring system, lead to mobile sensor network suffering false communication. This thesis, organized to introduce a new detection method to mitigate the effect of false data on the mobile AD-HOC network. DNACK, which proposed in this thesis, Is a new modification of NACK method. DNACK also consider about negative acknowledgment to find the false route messages. DNACK can detect modified messages in the middle of a route in oppose of NACK which, can detect false modified data on the destination. By comparison, the Delivery percentage on NACK and DNACK, DNACK shown better results in opposed to NACK method. Simulation has been done in three modes of node’s mobility Speed in meter per second (M:0 , M:5 and M; 10 ). In all situations, the efficiency of DNACK is better than NACK because in NACK nodes all packets (original and modified) are delivering to destination by contrast in DNACK just original packets are deliver to destination. However the Delivery percentage in NACK is Higher than DNACK which is around 2% for 10 meters per second nodes’ movement .Nevertheless DNACK is more efficient than NACK .On M=10 (m/s) DNACK shown 64% verified messages on Destination in opposed by 60% verified messages on NACK method. In overall the efficiency of packet delivery can be calculated by multiplication of overall delivery by verified packet shows that DNACK method has 51.5 % verified messages delivery in opposed of NACK by 49.8 % delivery on M=10 m/s.
机译:无线传感器网络上的路由异常和错误通信非常重要。攻击者可以吞噬传感器资源。没有中央监控系统,导致移动传感器网络遭受错误通信。本文旨在介绍一种新的检测方法,以减轻错误数据对移动AD-HOC网络的影响。本文提出的DNACK是对NACK方法的一种新的改进。 DNACK还考虑否定确认以找到错误的路由消息。与NACK相对,DNACK可以检测路由中间的已修改消息,而NACK可以检测到目标上的错误已修改数据。相比之下,与NACK方法相比,在NACK和DNACK,DNACK上的递送百分比显示出更好的结果。以节点移动性的三种模式(以米/秒为单位,M:0,M:5和M; 10)进行了仿真。在所有情况下,DNACK的效率都比NACK更好,因为在NACK节点中,所有数据包(原始数据包和修改数据包)都被传递到目的地,而DNACK中只有原始数据包被传递到目的地。但是,NACK中的传递百分比高于DNACK,后者在每秒10米的节点移动中约为2%。但是,DNACK比NACK效率更高。在M = 10(m / s)上,DNACK在目的地中显示了64%的已验证消息在NACK方法上被60%验证的消息反对。总体而言,可以通过将总传递乘以已验证的数据包来计算出数据包的传递效率,这表明在M = 10 m / s上,DNACK方法与NACK相比具有51.5%的已验证消息传递,而不是NACK。

著录项

  • 作者

    Abarghouei Babak Emami;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号