首页> 外文OA文献 >Claims for additional preliminaries costs due to project prolongation
【2h】

Claims for additional preliminaries costs due to project prolongation

机译:由于项目延期而导致的额外预备费用索赔

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Claims for additional preliminaries cost due to project prolongation is actually a part of loss and/or expense claim. The principle governing this claim was established in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) which provides that the party who suffers direct and reasonably foreseeable costs entitled to damages. This principle has been adopted in most of the standard forms of contract in Malaysia. As required by the contractual provisions such as in the PWD 203A (Rev. 2010/1), PAM Contract 2006, CIDB Form 2000 and IEM Form 1989, the contractor?s entitlement to loss and/or expense is limited to selected delaying events. In addition, the submission of claim must be made in specific time period as provided in the contract. There are cases when everything else was in order, the contractor was denied a claim due to his own failure to abide by the procedural requirement for submission of claim. The heads of claim under the loss and/or expense generally can be grouped under seven categories i.e. additional expenditure, interest and financing charges, loss of productivity, inflationary cost increase of materials and labour, site overheads or preliminaries, offsite or head office overheads and loss of profit. The objective of this research is to determine the preliminaries items that are considered and recommended for payment by contract administrators in claims for additional prolongation costs in the Malaysian construction industry. As a general guide, a possible list of claimable preliminaries items established from this study may be useful to contractors in their submission of loss and/or expense claims due to project prolongation in the future. It is also beneficial to contract administrators to learn how others evaluate the claims and thus, able to improve themselves on the way loss and/or expense being evaluated as compared to the settled law in this regard.
机译:由于项目延期而导致的其他初步费用的索赔实际上是损失和/或费用索赔的一部分。 Hadley诉Baxendale案(1854年)确立了处理该索赔的原则,该原则规定,遭受直接和合理可预见的损失的一方有权获得损害赔偿。马来西亚的大多数标准合同形式都采用了这一原则。根据合同条款(例如PWD 203A(Rev. 2010/1),PAM合同2006,CIDB Form 2000和IEM 1989)的要求,承包商对损失和/或费用的权利仅限于某些延误事件。此外,必须在合同规定的特定时间段内提出索赔。在某些情况下,其他一切都井井有条,承包商因自身未能遵守提交索赔的程序要求而被拒绝索赔。损失和/或费用项下的索赔负责人通常可以分为七类,即额外支出,利息和财务费用,生产力损失,材料和人工的通货膨胀成本增加,现场间接费用或预备费用,异地或总部间接费用以及利润损失。这项研究的目的是确定在马来西亚建筑业对额外延期费用的索赔中,合同管理者考虑并建议支付的初步项目。作为一般指南,从这项研究中建立的可索赔的初步项目清单可能对承包商由于将来的项目延期提交损失和/或费用索赔有用。对于合同管理者来说,学习其他人如何评估索赔也因此是有益的,因此,与这方面的确定的法律相比,他们能够在评估损失和/或费用的方式上提高自己。

著录项

  • 作者

    Saidin Aminuddin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号