首页> 外文OA文献 >Interactive contrasting learning styles : their impact on university student's learning orientations study skills and academic achievements
【2h】

Interactive contrasting learning styles : their impact on university student's learning orientations study skills and academic achievements

机译:交互式对比学习风格:它们对大学生学习取向,学习技能和学业成就的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study examines undergraduate university students’ learning styles and study skills level. A total of 310 undergraduate students of different study years and programs at the Education Faculty, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia involved in the study. The respondents comprised of 82 male and 228 female students. The study employed a set of questionnaire measuring on students’ different learning styles and study skills using four point scales. The five categories of learning styles by Dunn and Dunn are Environmental, Emotional, Sociological, Physical and Psychological. The six aspects of study skills are Referencing, Listening, Note-taking, Reading, Preparing for Examination and Managing Time. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient for the instrument is 0.83. The result showed that the students’ learning styles were mainly of Emotional category with mean score 3.09 (SD=0.63), second was Psychological category (mean 2.98, SD=0.84), third was Physical category (mean 2.87, SD=0.72), fourth was Environmental category (mean 2.81, SD=0.70) and finally, Sociological category (mean 2.81, SD=0.74). Generally, the students’ study skills level was found to be moderate. The mean score for Referencing Skill was 3.09 (SD=0.58), Listening Skill (mean 3.04, SD=0.64) and Note-taking Skill (mean 3.03, SD=0.71) were categorized as highest level. Three other skills i.e. Reading (mean 2.94, SD=0.66), Preparing for Exam (mean 2.80, SD=0.72) and Managing Time (mean 2.80, SD=0.75) were recorded at the moderate level. The different styles and study skills level adopted by students have directly influenced students’ orientations and approaches to learning. Finally, several recommendations were given to enhance students’ teaching and learning effectiveness.
机译:该研究检查了大学生的学习风格和学习技能水平。马来西亚Teknologi大学教育学院共有310名不同学习年限和课程的本科生参与了这项研究。受访者包括82名男生和228名女学生。这项研究使用了一套问卷调查表,使用四点量表来衡量学生的不同学习风格和学习技能。 Dunn和Dunn的五种学习方式分别是环境,情感,社会学,身体和心理学。学习技能的六个方面是参考,听力,记笔记,阅读,准备考试和安排时间。仪器的Cronbach Alpha系数为0.83。结果显示,学生的学习方式主要为情感类,平均分3.09(SD = 0.63),第二类为心理类(平均2.98,SD = 0.84),第三类为物理类(平均2.87,SD = 0.72) ,第四是环境类别(平均2.81,SD = 0.70),最后是社会学类别(平均2.81,SD = 0.74)。通常,发现学生的学习技能水平中等。参考技能的平均分数为3.09(SD = 0.58),听力技能(平均3.04,SD = 0.64)和记笔记技能(平均3.03,SD = 0.71)被归类为最高级别。中度水平记录了其他三个技能,即阅读(平均2.94,SD = 0.66),考试准备(平均2.80,SD = 0.72)和管理时间(平均2.80,SD = 0.75)。学生采用的不同风格和学习技能水平直接影响了学生的学习方向和方法。最后,提出了一些建议,以增强学生的教学效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号