首页> 外文OA文献 >A Study of Feedback Strategies in Foreign Language Classrooms and Tutorials with Implications for Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning Systems
【2h】

A Study of Feedback Strategies in Foreign Language Classrooms and Tutorials with Implications for Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning Systems

机译:智能计算机辅助语言学习系统对外语课堂教学中反馈策略的研究

摘要

This paper presents two new corpus-based studies of feedback in the domain of teaching Spanish as audforeign language, concentrating on the type and frequency of different feedback moves, as well as what happensudin the moves that follow the feedback. In particular, as well as looking at positive feedback, it concentrates onudtwo general kinds of negative feedback strategies: (1) Giving-Answer Strategies (GAS), where the teacher directlyudgives the desired target form or indicates the location of the error, and (2) Prompting-Answer Strategies (PAS),udwhere the teacher pushes the student less directly to notice and repair their own error. Investigating the GAS/PASuddistinction sheds light on the relative importance for Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning (ICALL)udsystems of knowledge construction from interaction, which many believe is crucial for effective learning from ITS.udThe main finding here is that, although GAS occur more frequently than PAS in both corpora, it is the PAS that areudmore effective, in terms of eliciting explicit repairs by the students.udThe first study takes place in a classroom context, whereas the second, smaller, study looks at tutorial interactions.udThis makes it possible to investigate the extent to which the mode of interaction influences the frequencyudand effectiveness of feedback moves, as well as to look at how concepts such as “wait time” are relevant to explainudmoves that are ineffective.udThe paper concludes by using these results to make recommendations about how to choose appropriate feedbackudmoves in ICALL systems.
机译:本文介绍了两种新的基于语料库的反馈研究,将西班牙语作为外语教学,重点研究了不同反馈动作的类型和频率以及跟随反馈的动作中发生了什么。特别是,除了着眼于正面反馈外,它还着重于两种常见的负面反馈策略:(1)给予-回答策略(GAS),其中教师直接给出期望的目标形式或指出目标的位置。错误,以及(2)提示-回答策略(PAS),其中教师会不那么直接地迫使学生注意并修复自己的错误。研究GAS / PAS uddistinction揭示了交互作用对智能计算机辅助语言学习(ICALL) uds知识构建系统的相对重要性,许多人认为这对于从ITS有效学习至关重要。 ud这里的主要发现是,尽管在两个语料库中GAS的发生都比PAS更为频繁,但从引起学生明确修复的角度来看,PAS更为有效。 ud第一项研究是在教室中进行的,而第二项研究规模较小,则看起来在教程交互中。 ud这使得可以调查交互方式在多大程度上影响反馈移动的频率/ udand的有效性,以及查看诸如“等待时间”之类的概念与解释 udmov相关的方式, ud本文最后总结了这些结果,就如何在ICALL系统中选择适当的反馈 udmovs提出了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号