首页> 外文OA文献 >The Principle of the Free Discretion of Judges as to the Probative Value of Evidence and u27the Degree of Proof
【2h】

The Principle of the Free Discretion of Judges as to the Probative Value of Evidence and u27the Degree of Proof

机译:法官对证据的证明价值和证明程度的自由裁量权原则

摘要

According to the common view in the Criminal Law Society of Japan,the probative values of most evidences were fixed in advance by law in the age of feudalism. The modern period,however,tumed it over and secured the freedom of judges to estimate the value of each evidence. We nowadays call the freedom the free conviction principle. u271,on the other hand,believe that the view is wrong. It was only the confessions,but not most evidences,the value of which were rated by law. The confession was rated very high and required to find the accused guilty of a crime. The judge could declare the accused guilty with confidence,that is to say,feeling relieved thanks to it. Butthe criminal procedure that doesnu27t dispense with a confession inevitably involved the torture.The enlightenment thought in the period of citizensu27 revolutions first of all attacked the torture as a typical vi­olation of human rights. It was the free conviction principle that made its appearance in the criminal suit to bring the torture to an end. In other words,the criminallaw at that time abandoned to place such a high value on the con­fession as to be a necess紅y condition for a judgment of guilty.
机译:根据日本刑法学会的普遍观点,在封建制度时代,大多数证据的证明价值是通过法律预先确定的。但是,现代时期已经结束,并确保了法官自由估计每个证据的价值。如今,我们称自由为自由信念原则。另一方面,相信这种观点是错误的。只是供词,不是多数证据,其价值是根据法律定级的。坦白的等级很高,要求对被告犯有罪行。法官可以自信地宣布被告有罪,也就是说,他对此感到宽慰。但是,不免认罪的刑事诉讼不可避免地涉及到酷刑。公民革命时期的启蒙思想首先将酷刑视为一种典型的侵犯人权行为。自由定罪原则在刑事诉讼中露面,以结束酷刑。换句话说,当时的刑法放弃了对这种宽泛的重视,以至于成为有罪判决的必要条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号