首页> 外文OA文献 >Uplifting manhood to wonderful heights? News coverage of the human costs of military conflict from world war I to Gulf war Two
【2h】

Uplifting manhood to wonderful heights? News coverage of the human costs of military conflict from world war I to Gulf war Two

机译:提升男子气概到极致?从第一次世界大战到第二次海湾战争的军事冲突对人类造成的损失的新闻报道

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Domestic political support is an important factor constraining the use of American military power aroundudthe world. Although the dynamics of war support are thought to reflect a cost-benefit calculus, with costsudrepresented by numbers of friendly war deaths, no previous study has examined how information aboutudfriendly, enemy, and civilian casualties is routinely presented to domestic audiences. This paper establishesuda baseline measure of historical casualty reporting by examining New York Times coverage of five majorudwars that occurred over the past century. Despite important between-war differences in the scale ofudcasualties, the use of conscription, the type of warfare, and the use of censorship, the frequency of casualtyudreporting and the framing of casualty reports has remained fairly consistent over the past 100 years.udCasualties are rarely mentioned in American war coverage. When casualties are reported, it is often in waysudthat minimize or downplay the human costs of war.
机译:国内政治支持是限制美国在世界范围内使用军事力量的重要因素。尽管战争支持的动态被认为反映了成本效益演算,而成本以友善的战争死亡人数来表示,但以前的研究都没有研究过如何定期向国内观众介绍有关友善,敌方和平民伤亡的信息。本文通过研究《纽约时报》对过去一个世纪发生的五次主要 udwar的报道,建立了历史伤亡报告的基准计量。尽管战争之间在伤亡人数,使用征兵,战争类型和检查制度方面存在重大差异,但在过去100年中,伤亡报告的频率和伤亡报告的形成一直相当一致伤亡很少在美国战争报道中提及。在报告人员伤亡时,通常是通过各种方式来最大限度地减少或轻视战争的人力成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号