首页> 外文OA文献 >Bits of power:udstruggling for control of information and communication networks
【2h】

Bits of power:udstruggling for control of information and communication networks

机译:功率位: ud努力控制信息和通信网络

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Contests for the control of information and communication networks and, specifically, control of digital bits of power (the capacity to control information processing) in the current period often take the form of struggles over network neutrality. This paper examines how, historically, such struggles have been accompanied by changes in the configuration of ideas or social imaginaries that have legitimized the actions of companies, the state and civil society in relation to the development of networks. The aim is to assess the likelihood that institutional arrangements will be put in place that might privilege citizen interests in preserving an open internet and strengthen the capacity of citizens to resist power asymmetries that threaten their fundamental rights to privacy, access to information, and freedom of expression in the digital environment. Concepts derived from historical institutionalism and the economic history of technical change provide a framework for examining continuity and change starting from the introduction of digital technologies. The analysis shows why a narrow policy focus on network neutrality can obscure the way citizen interests in the digitally mediated environment are subordinated to corporate and state interests, making it difficult to assess whether the current period is path dependent and locked in to a single direction for development or whether there is the potential for alternative pathways - a ‘forking of the road’ - which could be more favourable to citizens.
机译:在当前时期,有关控制信息和通信网络的竞赛,特别是控制数字电源(控制信息处理的能力)的竞赛通常采取争夺网络中立性的形式。本文从历史上考察了这种斗争是如何伴随观念或社会想象力的变化而发生的,这些变化使公司,国家和公民社会在网络发展方面的行为合法化。目的是评估将建立体制安排的可能性,这种体制安排可能会在维护开放式互联网方面特权于公民利益,并增强公民抵抗威胁其基本隐私权,获取信息权和自由的权力不对称的能力。在数字环境中表达。源自历史制度主义和技术变革的经济历史的概念为从数字技术的引入开始检查连续性和变化提供了框架。分析表明,为什么仅针对网络中立性的狭policy政策会掩盖数字化环境中的公民利益服从于公司和国家利益的方式,从而使得难以评估当前时期是否与路径相关并锁定在单一方向上。发展或是否存在替代途径的潜力-“分叉的道路”-可能对公民更有利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mansell Robin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号