首页> 外文OA文献 >Long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention for family carers of people with dementia: a single-blind, randomised, controlled trial
【2h】

Long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention for family carers of people with dementia: a single-blind, randomised, controlled trial

机译:老年痴呆症患者家庭照顾者心理干预的长期临床和成本效益:单盲,随机,对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background:-udTwo-thirds of people with dementia live at home supported mainly by family carers. These carers frequently develop clinical depression or anxiety, which predicts care breakdown. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness (long-term reduction of depression and anxiety symptoms in family carers) and cost-effectiveness of a psychological intervention called START (STrAtegies for RelaTives).udMethods:-udWe did a randomised, parallel-group trial with masked outcome assessments in three UK mental-health services and one neurological-outpatient dementia service. We included self-identified family carers of people with dementia who had been referred in the previous year and gave support at least once per week to the person with dementia. We randomly assigned these carers, via an online computer-generated randomisation system from an independent clinical trials unit, to either START, an 8-session, manual-based coping intervention delivered by supervised psychology graduates, or treatment as usual (TAU). The primary long-term outcomes were affective symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total score [HADS-T]) 2 years after randomisation and cost-effectiveness (health and social care perspectives) over 24 months. Analysis was by intention to treat, excluding carers with data missing at both 12 and 24 months. This trial is registered ISCTRN70017938.udFindings:-udFrom November 4, 2009, to June 8, 2011, we recruited 260 carers. 173 carers were randomly assigned to START and 87 to TAU. Of these 260 participants, 209 (80%) were included in the clinical efficacy analysis (140 START, 69 TAU). At 24 months, compared with TAU the START group was significantly better for HADS-T (mean difference −2·58 points, 95% CI −4·26 to −0·90; p=0·003). The intervention is cost effective for both carers and patients (67% probability of cost-effectiveness at the £20 000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, and 70% at the £30 000 threshold).udInterpretation:-udSTART is clinically effective, improving carer mood and anxiety levels for 2 years. Carers in the control TAU group were seven times more likely to have clinically significant depression than those receiving START. START is cost effective with respect to carer and patient outcomes, and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) thresholds. The number of people with dementia is rapidly growing, and policy frameworks assume that their families will remain the frontline providers of (unpaid) support. This cost-neutral intervention, which substantially improves family-carers' mental health and quality of life, should therefore be widely available.
机译:背景:痴呆症患者中有三分之二的人主要在家庭护理人员的支持下生活在家里。这些护理人员经常出现临床抑郁症或焦虑症,这预示了医疗服务的失败。我们旨在评估临床干预措施(家庭护理人员的抑郁症和焦虑症状的长期减轻)和称为START(STrAtegies for RelaTives)的心理干预措施的成本效益。 udMethods:- ud我们进行了随机分组的分组研究该试验在英国的三项精神卫生服务和一项神经科门诊痴呆症服务中进行了隐蔽的结果评估。我们纳入了自我识别的痴呆症患者家庭照顾者,这些人在上一年曾被转诊,并且每周至少对痴呆症患者提供一次支持。我们通过独立的临床试验单位通过在线计算机生成的随机系统,将这些护理人员随机分配给START,这是由受监督的心理学专业毕业生提供的基于人工干预的8疗程干预措施,或照常治疗(TAU)。主要的长期结局是随机分组后2年的情感症状(医院焦虑和抑郁量表总分[HADS-T])和24个月的成本效益(健康和社会护理观点)。分析是按治疗意图进行的,不包括在12和24个月内均缺少数据的护理人员。该试验已注册为ISCTRN70017938。 ud发现:- ud从2009年11月4日到2011年6月8日,我们招募了260名护理人员。 173名护理人员被随机分配给START,TAU被随机分配87。在这260名参与者中,有209名(80%)被包括在临床疗效分析中(140 START,69 TAU)。在24个月时,与TAU相比,START组的HADS-T明显更好(平均差异-2·58分,95%CI -4·26至-0·90; p = 0·003)。该干预对护理人员和患者均具有成本效益(在每个QALY支付意愿的门槛为£20 000时,成本效益的概率为67%,在£30 000的门槛下为70%)。 ud解释:- udSTART为临床有效,可改善护理者情绪和焦虑水平达2年。对照TAU组的护理人员发生临床上显着的抑郁的可能性是接受START的护理人员的7倍。就照顾者和患者的结局以及美国国立卫生研究院的门槛而言,START具有成本效益。痴呆症的人数正在迅速增长,并且政策框架假设其家人将仍然是(无偿)抚养费的第一线提供者。因此,这种成本中立的干预措施将大大改善家庭照顾者的心理健康和生活质量,因此应该广泛使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号