首页> 外文OA文献 >Outsider and insider expertise: the response of residents of deprived neighbourhoods to an academic definition of social exclusion
【2h】

Outsider and insider expertise: the response of residents of deprived neighbourhoods to an academic definition of social exclusion

机译:局外人和局内人专长:贫困社区居民对社会排斥的学术定义的回应

摘要

The aim of this paper is to compare academic interpretations of the term social exclusion with the understanding of people with direct experience of the phenomenon. A pre-selected group of residents of deprived neighbourhoods were asked about various aspects of the concept and their responses compared with the definitions of social exclusion used by Burchardt, Le Grand and Piachaud in their 1999 article in the journal Social Policy and Administration. In general, the residents’ understanding of the term corresponded well with the more academic definitions; however, in one or two key areas there were significant differences, for example, the importance of neighbourhood and ‘service poverty’, and the need for action against aspects of social exclusion on the grounds of social justice. This confirms that it might be useful for more academic concepts to be tested against the views of those with experience of the phenomenon which the concept is trying to capture.
机译:本文的目的是将对社会排斥一词的学术解释与对该现象有直接经验的人们的理解进行比较。一个预先选定的贫困社区居民群体被问及该概念的各个方面及其对策,并与Burchardt,Le Grand和Piachaud在其1999年《社会政策与行政》杂志中使用的社会排斥定义进行了比较。一般而言,居民对该术语的理解与更学术的定义非常吻合。但是,在一个或两个关键领域存在重大差异,例如,邻里和“服务贫困”的重要性以及基于社会公正理由采取行动应对社会排斥方面的必要性。这证实了,将更多的学术概念与那些具有该现象试图捕捉到的现象经验的人的观点进行测试可能是有用的。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2002
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号