首页> 外文OA文献 >Harm and offence in media content: a review of the evidence
【2h】

Harm and offence in media content: a review of the evidence

机译:媒体内容中的危害和犯罪:证据审查

摘要

With contributions from David Brake, Jesse Elvin, Rebecca Gooch, Judith Livingstone and Russell Luyt. Key points from the evidence on harm and offence: * Research shows some harmful effects of the media under certain circumstances, with media content being part of a multi-factor explanation of social concerns (violence, sexuality, stereotyping, etc). * Harm and offence must be balanced against a consideration of the benefits of the various media, although this was beyond the scope of the present review. * Much of the available research comes from the US and is based in a different media regulatory environment from that of the UK. In the UK there are specific regulatory systems in place to restrict access to inappropriate content or, in the case of children, to enable parents to regulate their children's consumption of inappropriate material. * The majority of research has been carried out in the field of television but this does not necessarily mean that television has a greater effect. There is some evidence for harm from film and games, but there is little current research into the effects of radio, music or print. There is very little research examining the influence of new media. * The evidence for harm is stronger in relation to children, especially boys and psychologically vulnerable people. Women and older people are more likely to be offended by what they watch. * The types of harm include cognitive (eg stereotypes about others), emotional (eg fear), and behavioural (eg aggressive behaviour). There is more evidence for harm in terms of aggression/violence and it seems to apply across a range of media. * There is less academic research into areas of offence but it is clear that individuals and certain groups find some media content offensive. * A range of factors are found to affect how audiences react to the different media. These include the context of media use (such as viewer choice) as well as editorial issues such as the narrative context in which the content appears or the way in which the characters are drawn. It is unclear how content which does not have these types of framework (such as user-generated content) might affect the audience. * The evidence base remains problematic to some extent, partly because not all researchers agree on the interpretation of the findings, especially for experimental research. There are also ethical and practical problems which prevent certain concerns being researched, for instance the long term effects of viewing violent material or the impact of pornography on children.
机译:由David Brake,Jesse Elvin,Rebecca Gooch,Judith Livingstone和Russell Luyt提供。危害和犯罪证据的重点:*研究显示了媒体在某些情况下的某些有害影响,媒体内容是对社会关注因素(暴力,性取向,刻板印象等)的多因素解释的一部分。 *危害与犯罪之间必须权衡考虑各种媒体的利益,尽管这超出了本次审查的范围。 *许多可用的研究来自美国,并且与英国的媒体监管环境不同。在英国,有专门的监管制度来限制对不适当内容的访问,或者对于儿童而言,使父母能够规范其子女对不适当材料的消费。 *大多数研究是在电视领域进行的,但这并不一定意味着电视具有更大的作用。有证据表明电影和游戏会造成伤害,但目前对广播,音乐或印刷品的影响的研究很少。很少有研究研究新媒体的影响。 *关于儿童,特别是男孩和心理脆弱人士的伤害证据更充分。妇女和老年人更容易因自己的观看而得罪。 *伤害的类型包括认知(例如,对他人的刻板印象),情感(例如,恐惧)和行为(例如,攻击性行为)。在侵略/暴力方面,有更多的危害证据,而且似乎适用于多种媒体。 *有关犯罪领域的学术研究较少,但很明显,个人和某些团体会发现某些媒体内容令人反感。 *发现影响观众对不同媒体反应的各种因素。这些内容包括媒体使用的上下文(例如观众选择)以及编辑问题,例如内容出现的叙事上下文或人物的绘制方式。目前尚不清楚没有这些类型的框架的内容(例如用户生成的内容)如何影响受众。 *证据基础在一定程度上仍然存在问题,部分是因为并非所有研究人员都同意对研究结果的解释,特别是对于实验研究。还有一些道德和实践问题,无法研究某些问题,例如,观看暴力内容的长期影响或色情对儿童的影响。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:10:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号