首页> 外文OA文献 >Brexit in the Supreme Court – a landmark ruling, or monumental waste of time and money?
【2h】

Brexit in the Supreme Court – a landmark ruling, or monumental waste of time and money?

机译:最高法院退欧-划时代的裁决,还是时间和金钱的巨大浪费?

摘要

The Miller case was of great interest to the legal and political establishment. But was it a landmark ruling for constitutional law? On the contrary, argues Simon Witney: the case was all about politics. Parliament made an error in drafting the EU Referendum Act, and then failed to clarify it. But Parliament, as this week’s vote showed, was quite content for the government to trigger Article 50. Enlightening though it was, the whole case was a waste of time and public money.
机译:米勒案对法律和政治机构非常感兴趣。但这是宪法的里程碑式的裁决吗?相反,西蒙·维特尼(Simon Witney)辩称:此案全与政治有关。国会在起草《欧盟公投法》时犯了一个错误,然后未能予以澄清。但是,正如本周的投票显示,议会对于政府触发第50条感到非常满意。尽管令人鼓舞,但整个案件浪费时间和公共资金。

著录项

  • 作者

    Witney Simon;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号