首页> 外文OA文献 >Managing a european recovery: The case for public spending for an energy transition
【2h】

Managing a european recovery: The case for public spending for an energy transition

机译:管理欧洲复苏:能源转型的公共支出案例

摘要

The public debate about a European economic recovery has atrophied in a stimulus vs. austerity, north vs. south blame game. Far too little attention is devoted to the question into which kind of investments stimulus funding should be channelled and what a long-term sustainable European recovery may look like. This article argues that public debate should shift from un-constructive criticism to constructive engagement. It suggests that instead of expanding funding to prop up ailing or outdated business models, Europe should adapt to the shifting centres of economic gravity, harness its comparative advantages, and manage its recovery by developing alternative energy technologies and building a concomitant industry. Europe will have to recognise that the private sector cannot accomplish such a recovery alone; overcoming market barriers to developing new economic sectors requires a sustained political commitment. In the long term, such an approach to recovery promises to deliver energy security and a more sustainable energy system, the creation of a viable export sector, and many new well-paid jobs with more equitable economic benefits than are offered, for instance, by the financial sector.
机译:关于欧洲经济复苏的公开辩论在刺激与紧缩,北与南的责备博弈中萎缩了。很少有人将注意力集中在以下问题上:应该将哪种投资刺激资金用于哪种投资,以及欧洲长期可持续的复苏可能是什么样子。本文认为,公共辩论应从非建设性批评转变为建设性参与。它表明,欧洲不应增加资金来支持陷入困境或过时的商业模式,而应适应发展中的经济重心,利用其比较优势,并通过开发替代能源技术和建立伴随的产业来管理其复苏。欧洲将不得不认识到,私营部门无法独自完成这种复苏。克服发展新经济部门的市场障碍需要持续的政治承诺。从长远来看,这种恢复方法有望提供能源安全和更可持续的能源系统,建立可行的出口部门,并提供许多新的高薪工作,其经济利益要比例如金融部门。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hänska Max; Siddiqui Afzal;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号