首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison among filter-based, impactor-based and continuous techniques for measuring atmospheric fine sulfate and nitrate
【2h】

Comparison among filter-based, impactor-based and continuous techniques for measuring atmospheric fine sulfate and nitrate

机译:基于过滤器,基于冲击器的连续技术测量大气中细硫酸盐和硝酸盐的比较

摘要

Filter-based methods for sampling aerosols are subject to great uncertainty if the gas-particle interactions on filter substrates are not properly handled. Sampling artifacts depend on both meteorological conditions and the chemical mix of the atmosphere. Despite numerous of studies on the subject, very few have evaluated filter-based methods in the Asian environments. This paper reports the results of a comparison of the performances of two filter-based samplers, including a Thermo Anderson Chemical Speciation Monitor (RAAS) and a honeycomb denuder filter-pack system, a Micro Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI) and a real-time ambient ion monitor (AIM, URG9000B) in measuring atmospheric concentrations of PM2.5 sulfate and nitrate. Field studies were conducted at an urban site in Jinan, Shandong province, during the winter of 2007 and at a rural site near Beijing in the summer of 2008. The AIM was first compared with the honeycomb denuder filter-pack system which was considered to have minimal sampling artifacts. After some modifications made to it, the AIM showed good performance for both sulfate and nitrate measurement at the two sites and was then used to evaluate other instruments. For the un-denuded RAAS, the extent of sampling artifacts for nitrate on quartz filters was negligible, while that on Teflon filters was also minimal at high nitrate concentrations (10 μgm-3); however, loss through evaporation was significant (∼75%) at low nitrate concentrations under hot summer conditions. The MOUDI using aluminum substrates suffered a significant loss of nitrate (50-70%) under summer conditions due to evaporation. Considering that the aluminum substrates are still being widely used to obtain size-resolved aerosol compositions because of their low cost and accurate mass weighed, caution should be taken about the potential significant under determination of semi-volatile components such as ammonium nitrate.
机译:如果未正确处理过滤器基材上的气体-颗粒相互作用,则基于过滤器的气溶胶采样方法将存在很大的不确定性。采样伪影取决于气象条件和大气的化学成分。尽管对此主题进行了大量研究,但很少有人对亚洲环境中基于过滤器的方法进行评估。本文报告了两个基于过滤器的采样器的性能比较结果,其中包括一个热安德森化学形态监测器(RAAS)和一个蜂窝式剥蚀器-过滤器系统,一个微孔均匀沉积撞击器(MOUDI)和一个真实的时间环境离子监测器(AIM,URG9000B)来测量大气中PM2.5硫酸盐和硝酸盐的浓度。在2007年冬季,在山东省济南市的一个城市现场进行了实地研究,在2008年夏季,在北京附近的农村现场进行了实地研究。首先,将AIM与被认为具有最少的采样伪影。经过对其进行一些修改,AIM在两个位置的硫酸盐和硝酸盐测量均显示出良好的性能,然后用于评估其他仪器。对于未剥蚀的RAAS,石英过滤器上硝酸盐的采样伪影程度可以忽略不计,而在高硝酸盐浓度(> 10μgm-3)上,特氟隆过滤器上硝酸盐的采样伪影也很小。然而,在炎热的夏季条件下,硝酸盐浓度低时,蒸发损失很大(约75%)。在夏季,由于蒸发,使用铝基材的MOUDI硝酸盐的损失显着(50-70%)。考虑到铝基底由于其低成本和精确称重而仍被广泛用于获得尺寸分辨的气溶胶组合物,因此应谨慎对待在测定半挥发性成分(如硝酸铵)下的潜在潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号