首页> 外文OA文献 >Developing a risk assessment model for ppp projects in China - a fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach
【2h】

Developing a risk assessment model for ppp projects in China - a fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach

机译:建立中国PPP项目风险评估模型-模糊综合评估法。

摘要

Earlier research works on PPP showed that an objective, reliable, and practical risk assessment model for PPP projects is essential to the successful implementation of PPP projects. However, actual empirical research studies in this research area are rather limited. This paper reports the second stage of a funded research study, which aims to develop a fuzzy synthetic evaluation model for assessing the risk level of a particular critical risk group (CRG) and the overall risk level associated with PPP projects in China. At the first research stage, thirty-four risk factors were identified through a comprehensive literature review and 3 new risk factors were proposed during a two-round Delphi questionnaire survey. The most critical 17 risk factors were selected through the calculation of normalized values. The correlation of these 17 critical risk factors (CRFs) was further analyzed via factor analysis and 6 CRGs were formulated, namely: (1) Macroeconomic Risk; (2) Construction and Operation Risk; (3) Government Maturity Risk; (4) Market Environment Risk; (5) Economic Viability Risk; and (6) Government Intervention. On the basis of the research works conducted at the first research stage, the weightings for each of the 17 critical risk factors (CRFs) and 6 CRGs were determined through the two-round Delphi questionnaire survey. A set of knowledge-based fuzzy inference rules was then established to set up the membership function for the 17 CRFs and 6 CRGs. The empirical research findings showed that the overall risk level of PPP highway projects is between "moderate risk" and "high risk". Hence it could be construed that investment in PPP highway projects in China may be considered as risky. In fact, the Delphi survey respondents perceived that "Government Intervention" is the most CRG; with "Government Maturity Risk" being the second; "Economic Viability Risk" the third; "Market Environment Risk" the fourth; "Construction and Operation Risk" the fifth; and "Macroeconomic Risk" the last. These findings revealed that government intervention and corruption may be the major hurdles to the success of PPP highway projects in China. These may be caused by inadequate law and supervision system and poor public decision-making process. Although the fuzzy synthetic evaluation model was primarily developed for PPP projects in general, the research method could be replicated in a specific type of PPP project, such as water treatment projects and hospital projects, to produce similar models for inter-type comparisons. By doing so, it provides an opportunity for practitioners to assess the risk level of different types of PPP projects based on objective evidence rather than subjective judgment. The most CRG for different types of PPP projects could be identified and both precautionary and remedial actions could be taken as soon as possible. Such an extension would provide a deeper understanding of managing different types of PPP projects.
机译:PPP的早期研究工作表明,PPP项目的客观,可靠和实用的风险评估模型对于PPP项目的成功实施至关重要。但是,该研究领域中的实际经验研究非常有限。本文报告了一项获资助的研究的第二阶段,该研究旨在建立一个模糊综合评估模型,用于评估特定关键风险组(CRG)的风险水平以及与中国PPP项目相关的整体风险水平。在第一个研究阶段,通过全面的文献综述确定了34种危险因素,并在为期两轮的Delphi问卷调查中提出了3种新的危险因素。通过计算标准化值选择了最关键的17个风险因素。通过因子分析进一步分析了这17个关键风险因子的相关性,并提出了6个CRG,分别为:(1)宏观经济风险; (二)建设经营风险; (三)政府到期风险; (四)市场环境风险; (五)经济生存风险; (六)政府干预。在第一阶段的研究工作的基础上,通过两轮Delphi问卷调查确定了17个关键危险因素(CRF)和6个CRG各自的权重。然后建立了一套基于知识的模糊推理规则,以建立17个CRF和6个CRG的隶属函数。实证研究结果表明,PPP公路项目的总体风险水平在“中等风险”和“高风险”之间。因此,可以解释为对中国PPP公路项目的投资可能被认为具有风险。实际上,Delphi调查的受访者认为“政府干预”是最高的CRG。其次是“政府成熟度风险”; “经济生存力风险”第三; 《市场环境风险》第四期; 《建设与经营风险》第五条;最后是“宏观经济风险”。这些发现表明,政府的干预和腐败可能是中国PPP公路项目成功的主要障碍。这可能是由于法律和监督体系不完善以及公共决策流程不当造成的。尽管一般来说,模糊综合评价模型主要是针对PPP项目开发的,但该研究方法可以在特定类型的PPP项目中重复使用,例如水处理项目和医院项目,以产生类似的模型用于类型间比较。这样,它为从业人员提供了一个机会,可以根据客观证据而不是主观判断来评估不同类型的PPP项目的风险水平。可以确定不同类型的PPP项目的最大CRG,并可以尽快采取预防和补救措施。这样的扩展将提供对管理不同类型的PPP项目的更深入的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号